Showing posts with label Gabrielle Giffords. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gabrielle Giffords. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Siena II: Good News For Gillibrand by Liz Benjamin - Capital Tonight

Read original...
Some great news for Senator Gillibrand in the new Siena poll out today. 
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand’s approval rating continues to climb in the wake of her first-ever statewide election success last November, even as GOP leaders continue to search for a candidate to challenge her in 2012.

Today’s Siena poll found New York’s junior senator is enjoying her highest favorable rating ever: 57-18 percent, up from 50-24 percent just four months ago.
A year and a half away from facing voters again – this time for a full six-year term, and not merely the remainder of former Sen. Hillary Clinton’s term – 52 percent of voters, including a plurality of Republicans, say they are prepared to re-elect Gillibrand.
Twenty-nine percent would prefer “someone else,” and 19 percent are undecided.
At least two of Gillibrand’s 2010 GOP opponents, former Rep. Joe DioGuardi and David Malpass, are considering potential re-match attempts against her in 2012.
Former LG Betsy McCaughey is being touted as a possible Gillibrand opponent, and she hasn’t yet ruled out a run. McCaughey spoke at New York’s CPAC and also the the national CPAC this past weekend in Washington, D.C. I’m told some of her “Obamacare” red meat won her a standing ovation.
Gillibrand has been enjoying a spate of national attention following the repeal last year of “DADT” and passage of the Zadroga bill, both of which she made top priorities after inheriting Clinton’s seat in January 2009.
She also unexpectedly became a de facto spokeswoman for injured Rep. Gabby Giffords after her good friend opened her eyes in the hospital while Gillibrand held her hand.
Republicans are worried 2012 will be even more of an uphill battle to anyone seeking to dislodge Gillibrand than 2010 was due to the presence of President Obama atop the Democratic ticket in a Democrat-dominated state like New York. This might be the party’s last chance to defeat Gillibrand, as most agree the longer she holds onto the seat, the less likely she is to lose it.

Thursday, February 3, 2011

Protecting Mental Health Services by Shirley L. Huntley - New York State Senator

Tucson’s Lesson: Protecting Mental Health Services

The tragedy in Tucson, Arizona will go down in history as one of our nation’s darkest days. Since then, many across the political spectrum have spoken out on the need to tone down the partisan political rhetoric throughout the nation and enhance the nation’s gun control enforcement. However, as the nation searches for answers, the tragedy sheds light on a more immediate concern in our society that has been habitually ignored: the state of our mental health system.

By all accounts, Jared Loughner was the epitome of the weaknesses in our mental health system: a troubled youngster, struggling to express his emotions in a perplexing society. He was banned from his college classroom until he could prove he was not a physical threat to himself, or anyone else. Think about that – an institution of higher learning recognized the serious need for mental health services and yet those services were unused. How did our mental health care delivery system reach such a point?

Sadly, with no alternative outlet, and no professional help, Loughner spiraled into his own dark world and turned to violence.

We cannot forget: for every person like Loughner who couldn’t be – or weren’t – helped there are tens of thousands of individuals that can. However, they will only receive access to the services they need if we foster an environment that encourages the restoration and repair of the mental health system in both
New York and the nation.

Fixing a Broken System

Michael Fitzpatrick, executive director of the National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI), recently said, “The mental-health-care ‘system’ in America is a broken system.” Mr. Fitzpatrick’s assessment could not be more precise.

Frederick Douglass once remarked how it is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men. Access to mental health professionals at an early age can be of tremendous help to suffering individuals, and a study done by the Institute of Medicine of the National Academies has reported that half of all cases of mental illness appear by the age of 14, and 75 percent by age 24.

Furthermore, less than a quarter of the mentally ill get the care they need; and presently, there is an egregious lag time of nearly 9 years between the onset of mental illness and when the individual receives treatment. And in New York only 61 percent of children 2-17 with emotional, developmental, or behavioral problems received mental health care in 2007.

In the past two years the Senate Democrats worked extremely hard at improving New York’s mental health services. We passed an extension of Kendra’s Law and also passed groundbreaking legislation that changed insurance law to protect children with autism, setting the bar for a new national standard for treatment and services. Also, we were able to provide adequate funding for mental health services in last year’s budget, something that we must do again this year.

Making the Difficult Decisions

New Yorkers understand all too well that difficult decisions and tough cuts need to be made to lower state spending and balance our budget. But we must cut with care.

The duty of a public official is to protect our most vulnerable and provide a voice to the voiceless. We must remember why we are here and who needs us to fight for them. The stakes are high, and these services are critical to the well-being of all New Yorkers. We cannot continue to overlook how essential mental health services are until an event rattles the nation and then decide they are important.


Senator Huntley currently serves as Ranking Member for the Senate Committee on Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities. She represents the 10th Senate District based in South East Queens. She was recently overwhelmingly elected to her third term in the State Senate.

Saturday, January 15, 2011

Recent Statements from NYC Public Advocate Bill DeBlasio on Gun Control Matters...



STATEMENT BY PUBLIC ADVOCATE DE BLASIO ON TAKING HIGH-CAPACITY CLIPS FOR HANDGUNS OFF THE MARKET – January 14th

The Glock handgun used in last Saturday’s horrific shooting in Tucson, Arizona fired off 33 rounds before its owner, Jared Lee Loughner, was wrestled to the ground as he paused to reload. In that time, he wounded 13 people including Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords. He killed six others, including 9-year-old Christina Green.

Until it expired in 2004, the Assault Weapons Ban stopped 33-round clips like the one used in Arizona from being manufactured and sold to civilians. Since that time, these clips have flooded the marketplace.

With Congress unlikely to act on this danger and pass legislation, we must do everything we can here in New York City to fight the rising tide of gun violence.

Yesterday, Public Advocate Bill de Blasio joined the New York Post in calling on the New York City Police Department to start buying the firearms they need from a different company until Glock agrees to stop selling 30-round magazines to consumers.

Too often we forget the potential of our enormous purchasing power to convince businesses to act more responsibly. This is an opportunity to use this asset the right way.

Click here to read today’s New York Post article on the proposal.


STATEMENT BY PUBLIC ADVOCATE DE BLASIO ON GLOCK HIGH CAPACITY GUN MAGAZINES - January 13, 2011

This week Mayor Bloomberg has once again shown national leadership on the issue of gun control by urging new steps be taken to curb illegal gun sales. The Mayor is not alone in highlighting the need for new action on the issue of gun control in the aftermath of the Arizona tragedy. The New York Post editorial board has rightly argued that the Glock manufactured 30-round magazines, like the one used by clearly disturbed Jared Loughner, present an unacceptable risk to human life and at the same time no justifiable civilian purpose. If Glock will not stop selling these magazines to consumers, then the New York City Police Department should start buying the firearms they need from a different company.”


STATEMENT BY PUBLIC ADVOCATE DE BLASIO ON MAYOR BLOOMBERG’S CALL FOR NEW FEDERAL GUN CONTROLS - January 11, 2011

I commend Mayor Bloomberg for speaking out today in favor of more vigorous steps to curb illegal guns, and for the leadership he has shown through the Mayors Against Illegal Guns coalition. We must heed one of the clearest lessons of Saturday’s shooting in Tucson, Arizona: there are too many guns in violent hands. It is a lesson just as urgent to us here in New York following the shooting deaths of three people yesterday in the span of just four hours. The assassination attempt on Congresswoman Giffords and the murder of six bystanders should be a rallying moment for this country to adopt more commonsense gun reforms.”

Friday, January 14, 2011

MoveOn.org Meeting with Congressman Joe Crowley on January 11th...

Standing from the right: Joe Sherman, Bill Krum, Rep Crowley, David Quintana and Joe Lauria - Seated: Raphael Schweizer, Zo Halton and Paco Lugovina  - Click on image to enlarge

On Tuesday, January 11th, members from the Bronx and Queens MoveOn.org Councils met with Representative Joe Crowley at his Bronx office on Bruckner Blvd to discuss our progressive values and seek his assistance and commitment to pursuing them during the upcoming Congressional legislative session.

Among the items we presented and discussed with Congressman Crowley were:

  • An extension of unemployment benefits for 99'ers and a federal job training bill to get american back to work...
  • Green Energy Initatives to help America be a leader in clean energy policies and end our use of foreign oil...tied into this was the need to a new commitment to rebuilding our roads, bridges and infrastructure...
  • An end to the endless wars in Iran and Afghanistan and to use the money towards domestic policies...
  • A repeal of the onerous and Un-American Patriot Act...which goes against the Bill of Rights and numerous other Constitutional guaranteed rights of all Americans...
  • Cleaning up federal campaigns including campaign finance reform, enactment of the Disclose Act and a repeal of the Citizen United bill...
  • Comprehensive federal Gun Control and reenactment of the Assault Weapons Act and the Brady Bill...
  • Healthcare reform including fighting back against the Republican's repeal of the recently passed bill and making it even more progressive with the inclusion of single payer option...
  • We stressed the need for a comprehensive Immigration policy and to seek the passage of the Dream Act...
  • Mental health issues were discussed in regard to the recent Gabrielle Giffords tragedy in Arizona...

Congressman Crowley was supportive on many of the issues and vowed to push against the wrong-headed incoming Republican majority's agenda...He also agreed to work with us and meet with us in the future to assist us realizing our goals for a better America...

Click on image to enlarge

Wednesday, January 12, 2011

Senator Gillibrand Travels with President Obama to Memorial Service in Tucson



U.S. Senator Kirsten Gillibrand just boarded Air Force One with President Barack Obama to travel to Tucson, Arizona, and attend tonight’s memorial service for the victims of last weekend’s shooting. Senator Gillibrand, along with other Congressional members, will first travel to the University of Arizona Medical Center to visit with Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords’ husband, staff, and other victims and their loved ones. Senator Gillibrand released the following statement:

“Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. said that only in moments of darkness, can we see the stars. I hope in this time of sadness and loss, we can find new strength to come together as a nation and foster greater respect for one another.

“We may never make any sense of this heinous crime, but I remember how Gabby so often urged people to stand up to the violent language that divides us, and focus on solutions. That is exactly what we need to do right now.

“I want to thank President Obama for his compassionate leadership at this time of great national tragedy. My thoughts and prayers are with all the victims of this horrible tragedy, their loved ones, and with all Americans as we struggle to move forward together.”

Sunday, January 9, 2011

Bloodshed Puts New Focus on Vitriol in Politics by Carl Hulse and Kate Zernike - NYTimes.com

Read original...


While the exact motivations of the suspect in the shootings remained unclear, an Internet site tied to the man, Jared Lee Loughner, contained antigovernment ramblings. And regardless of what led to the episode, it quickly focused attention on the degree to which inflammatory language, threats and implicit instigations to violence have become a steady undercurrent in the nation’s political culture.
Clarence W. Dupnik, the Pima County sheriff, seemed to capture the mood of the day at an evening news conference when he said it was time for the country to “do a little soul-searching.”
“It’s not unusual for all public officials to get threats constantly, myself included,” Sheriff Dupnik said. “That’s the sad thing about what’s going on in America: pretty soon we’re not going to be able to find reasonable, decent people willing to subject themselves to serve in public office.”
In the hours immediately after the shooting of Ms. Giffords, a Democrat, and others in a supermarket parking lot in Tucson, members of both parties found rare unity in their sorrow. Top Republicans including Speaker John A. Boehner and Gov. Jan Brewer of Arizona quickly condemned the violence.
“An attack on one who serves is an attack on all who serve,” Mr. Boehner said in a statement. “Acts and threats of violence against public officials have no place in our society.”
President Obama made a brief appearance at the White House, calling the shooting an “unspeakable act” and promising to “get to the bottom of this.”
Not since the Oklahoma City bombing in 1995 has an event generated as much attention as to whether extremism, antigovernment sentiment and even simple political passion at both ends of the ideological spectrum have created a climate promoting violence. The fallout seemed to hold the potential to upend the effort by Republicans to keep their agenda front and center in the new Congress and to alter the political narrative in other ways.
The House was set to vote Wednesday on the new Republican majority’s proposal to repeal the health care law that had energized their supporters and ignited opposition from the Tea Party movement. Representative Eric Cantor of Virginia, the new majority leader, said Saturday that the vote and other planned legislative activity would be postponed.
The original health care legislation stirred strong feelings that flared at angry town hall meetings held by many Democratic lawmakers during the summer of 2009. And there has been broader anger and suspicion rising about the government, its finances and its goals, with the discourse partially fueled by talk shows and Web sites.
Tea Party activists also condemned the shooting. Judson Phillips, the founder of Tea Party Nation, noted on his Web site that Ms. Giffords is “a liberal,” but added, “that does not matter now. No one should be a victim of violence because of their political beliefs.”
But others said it was hard to separate what had happened from the heated nature of the debate that has swirled around Mr. Obama and Democratic policies of the past two years.
“It is fair to say — in today’s political climate, and given today’s political rhetoric — that many have contributed to the building levels of vitriol in our political discourse that have surely contributed to the atmosphere in which this event transpired,” said a statement issued by the leaders of the National Jewish Democratic Council. Ms. Giffords is the first Jewish woman elected to the House from her state.
During last spring’s health care votes, the language used against some lawmakers was ratcheted up again, with protesters outside the House hurling insults and slurs. The offices of some Democrats, including Ms. Giffords’s in Tucson, were vandalized.
Ms. Giffords was also among a group of Democratic House candidates featured on the Web site of Sarah Palin’s political action committee with cross hairs over their districts, a fact that disturbed Ms. Giffords at the time.
“We’re on Sarah Palin’s targeted list,” Ms. Giffords said last March. “But the thing is the way that she has it depicted has the cross hairs of a gun sight over our district. When people do that, they’ve got to realize there’s consequences to that.”
The image is no longer on the Web site, and Ms. Palin posted a statement saying “my sincere condolences are offered to the family of Representative Gabrielle Giffords and the other victims of today’s tragic shooting in Arizona. On behalf of Todd and my family, we all pray for the victims and their families, and for peace and justice.” (Late Saturday, the map was still on Ms. Palin’s Facebook page.)
Democrats have also pointed out cases where Republican candidates seemed to raise the prospect of armed revolt if Washington did not change its ways.
But many Republicans have noted that they too are subject to threats and abuse and, during the health care fight some suggested Democrats were trying to cut off responsible opposition and paint themselves as victims.
Sensitive to the issue, Tea Party activists in Arizona said they quickly reviewed their membership lists to check whether the suspect, Mr. Loughner, was associated with them. They said they found no evidence that he was.
Tea Party members in Tucson had disagreed sharply with Ms. Giffords, particularly as the health care debate unfolded, but she ended up backing the measure despite the political risks. They strongly supported her opponent, Jesse Kelly, in the November election, and staged several protests outside her office.
DeAnn Hatch, a co-founder of the Tucson Tea Party, said her group had never staged any rallies against the congresswoman elsewhere, and she did not believe there were any Tea Party protesters at the event Saturday.
“I want to strongly, strongly say we absolutely do not advocate violence,” she said. “This is just a tragedy to no end.”
But others said it would be hard to separate this shooting from the ideological clash.
“At a time like this, it is terrible that we do have to think about politics, but no matter what the shooter’s motivations were, the left is going to blame this on the Tea Party movement,” Mr. Phillips, from Tea Party Nation, said on his Web site.
“While we need to take a moment to extend our sympathies to the families of those who died, we cannot allow the hard left to do what it tried to do in 1995 after the Oklahoma City bombing,” he wrote. “Within the entire political spectrum, there are extremists, both on the left and the right. Violence of this nature should be decried by everyone and not used for political gain.”