Saturday, August 4, 2007

Newsday.com: NYC Councilman Faces Rape Charge, Ethics Committee...

NYC councilman faces rape charge, ethics committee -- Newsday.com:

1:56 AM EDT, August 4, 2007

NEW YORK - A city councilman asked to be temporarily removed from his committee assignments while he contends with charges of raping a woman in his office hours after they met in a bar, the city council speaker said.


Councilman Dennis Gallagher pleaded not guilty Friday after a grand jury indicted him on multiple rape and assault charges. In testimony before the grand jury earlier this week, the councilman, a married father of two, acknowledged an encounter with his 52-year-old accuser but said it was consensual.

"He concedes that it was morally bad conduct on his part, but he absolutely and vehemently denies any criminal wrongdoing," said his lawyer, Stephen R. Mahler.

Gallagher's accuser told authorities the councilman offered to drive her home after they met in the bar on July 8, but instead took her to his Queens district office, where he attacked her.


Queens District Attorney Richard Brown called the allegations "troubling _ particularly because they involve the actions of a public official who has a special responsibility to uphold and obey the law."

Gallagher, elected to the council in 2001, is one of three Republicans in the 51-member body. He lives in the Middle Village section of Queens with his family, according to the council's Web site.

Council Speaker Christine Quinn said Friday that Gallagher had requested to be temporarily relieved of his committee duties. On Thursday, Quinn described the allegations against Gallagher as "deeply troubling" and said the council's Standards and Ethics Committee would weigh the case.

If convicted, Gallagher faces up to 25 years in prison. He was released on $200,000 bail and was scheduled to return to court Sept. 28.

New York Times: A Queens City Councilman Is Indicted in a Rape Case by Ray Rivera...

A Queens City Councilman Is Indicted in a Rape Case - New York Times:

Published: August 3, 2007

City Councilman Dennis P. Gallagher has been indicted by a Queens grand jury investigating rape allegations against him, the councilman and his lawyer confirmed yesterday.

The indictment remained sealed yesterday and Mr. Gallagher, a Queens Republican, said he did not know what charges were handed up. The Queens district attorney is expected to hold a news conference today to announce the results of the grand jury’s deliberations.

The indictment comes one day after Mr. Gallagher appeared before the grand jury, telling the 23-member panel that the sexual encounter at the center of the allegations was consensual, his lawyer said. He continued to assert his innocence yesterday.

“The grand jury did not have all the information, nor did it hear all the witnesses,” he said in a telephone interview from his Middle Village home. “At the end, after the trial process when all the information can be heard, I strongly feel I will be vindicated of any charges.”

The Queens district attorney, Richard A. Brown, would not discuss the indictment yesterday. “Any action that’s taken by the grand jury is sealed as a matter of law,” he said. Criminal charges contained in an indictment are unsealed when a defendant is arraigned.

Council Speaker Christine C. Quinn commented on the allegations for the first time yesterday.

“The Council and I take very seriously the deeply troubling allegations against council member Dennis Gallagher,” she said in a statement. “Therefore, the matter is being immediately referred to the City Council’s Standards and Ethics Committee, which will meet at the beginning of next week.”

Mr. Gallagher is expected to surrender to the police this morning and then be arraigned. He is expected to plead not guilty to whatever charges are filed, his lawyer, Stephen R. Mahler said.

Mr. Mahler was sharply critical of the grand jury proceedings, saying that a majority of the questions asked of his client were designed to prejudice jurors against him. He said he planned to immediately file a motion to dismiss the charges based on what he said was prosecutorial misconduct.

“Well, this grand jury presentation was really stark evidence why lawyers almost always advise clients who are targets of an investigation not to testify,” he said.

Mr. Gallagher chose to testify despite his advice, Mr. Mahler said, because he “felt he didn’t want to hide behind legal maneuvering and felt he owed it to his constituents to come forward and say he’d done nothing illegal.” Kevin R. Ryan, a spokesman for the Queens district attorney’s office, declined to comment on Mr. Mahler’s allegations.

The investigation began after a woman told the police that Mr. Gallagher had raped her at his Council office in Middle Village on July 8, after the two had been drinking at a nearby bar.

Mr. Gallagher, 43, is married with two children. Before being elected to the Council in 2001, he was a longtime chief of staff to Thomas V. Ognibene, the former Council minority leader. Mr. Ognibene said he was saddened by news of the indictment.

“There was nothing in my relationship with him to indicate that he was capable of this kind of conduct, so it was shocking to hear of this indictment. But speaking as a lawyer, an indictment is nothing but an accusation, and people ought to allow him the presumption of innocence,” Mr. Ognibene said.

The last council member indicted in a crime was Angel Rodriguez, a Brooklyn Democrat who resigned in 2002 before pleading guilty to federal bribery charges, according to Council officials.

William K. Rashbaum contributed reporting.

NY Daily News: Makes Bail & Vows 'I'll Be Vindicated' as Wife Watches; DA sez

Makes bail & vows 'I'll be vindicated' as wife watches; DA sez...

Cuffed Queens pol arraigned on rape

Makes bail & vows 'I'll be vindicated' as wife watches; DA sez


City Councilman Dennis Gallagher with wife, Donna.

City Councilman Dennis Gallagher leaves the court with his wife, Donna, after making bail.


City Councilman Dennis Gallagher surrendered to police yesterday and was arraigned in handcuffs before a Queens judge on 10 counts of rape, assault and sex charges.

With his wife watching from the audience, the Middle Village councilman held his head high as a clerk read off charges that Gallagher raped a 52-year-old grandmother in his district office last month.

"I shall be vindicated," a defiant Gallagher told the Daily News seconds after pleading not guilty and making $200,000 in bail. "I am innocent of these charges."

Gallagher, who faces up to 25 years in jail if convicted, walked out of the courtroom with his brother, his wife and his lawyer at his side to face a slew of television and newspaper photographers.

The councilman, 43, is charged with meeting the woman on July 8 at one of his favorite watering holes, Danny Boy's, where he offered to drive her home.

Instead, he took her to his office on Metropolitan Ave. and forced her to have sex, cops said.

Gallagher testified before a grand jury for two hours on Wednesday and underwent intense grilling from Queens prosecutor Kenneth Appelbaum. He admitted the encounter happened but insisted it was consensual, sources said.

"It's a relief," Gallagher's alleged victim said while watching him walk into court on television. She declined further comment.

"The allegations are very troubling - particularly because they involve the actions of a public official who has a special responsibility to uphold and obey the law," said Queens District Attorney Richard Brown, adding that Gallagher should think about resigning.

"It seems to me ... that his ability to represent his councilmatic district and to function as a legislator has been seriously impaired by these allegations," Brown said.

Gallagher, who is term-limited in 2009, said he would not step down, but he resigned as council minority whip and gave up his committee assignments.

His only defenders seemed to be the crowd at Danny Boy's.

"It's like he's already been convicted," said one fellow drinker, who would only give his first name, Eddie. "Whatever happened to innocent until proven guilty?"

sshifrel@nydailynews.com

With Kirsten Danis and Peter Kadushin

  1. Queens pol is eyed in sexual assault
  2. Queens councilman in sex rap won't appear before grand jury
  3. In limbo, sez Queens scandal pol
  4. Queens pol accused of rape comes out of hiding
  5. Queens pol in rape case might talk to grand jury
  6. Call me adulterer, not rapist, pol insists
  7. Councilman Gallagher indicted for rape
  8. City pol indicted
  9. Queens councilman surrenders on rape charges

wnbc.com: Lawyer: NYC Councilman Will Fight Indictment In Sex Case...

Lawyer: NYC Councilman Will Fight Indictment In Sex Case - Investigations News Story - WNBC | New York

A city councilman was turning himself in Friday to face charges stemming from a sexual encounter in his Queens office, his lawyer said.
  • Watch Video: Pol To Surrender

  • The indictment against Councilman Dennis Gallagher had not been unsealed early Friday, and attorney Stephen R. Mahler said he was unsure what the exact charges would be. Gallagher expected to be arraigned on Friday, his lawyer said.

    The Queens district attorney's office declined to comment, but scheduled a news conference to "announce the results of the grand jury's investigation into rape allegations." Mahler said Gallagher planned to fight the charges. According to the allegations, Gallagher -- a married father of two who represents part of Queens -- met his accuser in a bar on the night of the encounter, and the two arranged to leave together for his office, Mahler said. The date and other details were not immediately available. The woman said the sexual contact which occurred was not consensual. Gallagher acknowledges the encounter, but "our position is everything was totally consensual -- her story makes no sense," Mahler said. "He concedes that it was morally bad conduct on his part, but he absolutely and vehemently denies any criminal wrongdoing." Authorities raided Gallagher's office last month. Mahler said Gallagher later testified before the grand jury, despite what the attorney described as his standard advice to clients against doing so. "He felt, as an officeholder, he owed it his constituents not to hide behind legalisms and to appear before the grand jury and tell his side of it," Mahler said. Gallagher, elected to the council in 2001, is one of three Republicans in the 51-member panel. He lives in the Middle Village section of Queens with his family, according to the council's Web site. Council Speaker Christine Quinn on Thursday described the allegations against Gallagher as "deeply troubling." She said in a statement that the council's Standards and Ethics Committee would weigh the case as soon as next week.

    Wednesday, July 25, 2007

    NY Times: Union-Friendly Maverick Leads New Charge for Charter Schools by Sam Dillon...


    Union-Friendly Maverick Leads New Charge for Charter Schools - New York Times:

    LOS ANGELES — Steve Barr, a major organizer of charter schools, has been waging what often seems like a guerrilla war for control of this city’s chronically failing high schools.

    In just seven years, Mr. Barr’s Green Dot Public Schools organization has founded 10 charter high schools and has won approval to open 10 more. Now, in his most aggressive challenge to the public school system, he is fighting to seize control of Locke Senior High, a gang-ridden school in Watts known as one of the worst in the city. A 15-year-old girl was killed by gunfire there in 2005.

    In the process, Mr. Barr has fomented a teachers revolt against the Los Angeles Unified School District. He has driven a wedge through the city’s teachers union by welcoming organized labor — in contrast to other charter operators — and signing a contract with an upstart union. And he has mobilized thousands of black and Hispanic parents to demand better schools.

    Educators and policy makers from Sacramento to Washington are watching closely because many believe Green Dot’s audacious tactics have the potential to strengthen and expand the charter school movement nationwide.

    “He’s got a take-no-prisoners style,” said Jaime Regalado, the director of the Edmund G. “Pat” Brown Institute of Public Affairs at California State University, Los Angeles. “He’s channeled the outrage of African-American and Latino parents into the public space in a way that’s new.”

    Charter schools are publicly financed but managed by groups separate from school districts. Most other major charter organizations have focused on opening easier-to-run elementary and middle schools, not taking over devastated high schools.

    Mr. Barr says, “We want systemic change, not to create oases in a desert.”

    And while most charters have nonunion teachers and are often called union busters by opponents, Mr. Barr, a former fund-raiser for the California Democratic Party and co-founder of Rock the Vote, prefers to work with organized labor. Teachers at Green Dot schools have a contract, though one less rigid than at other Los Angeles schools.

    Mr. Barr’s posture, as well as promising results at some of his schools, has attracted teachers to his side, even while splitting the larger teachers union, some of whose officials have been fighting him tooth and nail. Randi Weingarten, the president of the United Federation of Teachers in New York City, is working with him to put a Green Dot school in the South Bronx.

    That alliance embarrassed United Teachers Los Angeles, which represents some 40,000 teachers. A. J. Duffy, its president, said in an interview that his union had allowed work rule waivers for some Los Angeles schools, but had erred several years ago by ruling out an arrangement with Green Dot.

    “We could have and probably should have organized the Green Dot schools,” Mr. Duffy said. “They started with one charter school, now have 10, and in short order they’ll have 20 schools in Los Angeles, with all the teachers paying dues to a different union. And that’s a problem.”

    The union representing Green Dot teachers, Association de Maestros Unidos, has a 33-page contract that offers competitive salaries but no tenure, and it allows class schedule and other instructional flexibility outlawed by the 330-page contract governing most Los Angeles schools.

    Andrew J. Rotherham, who worked in the Clinton White House and is co-director of Education Sector, a research group in Washington, said, “Green Dot is mobilizing parents in poor neighborhoods and offering an alternative for frustrated teachers, and that’s scrambling the cozy power arrangements between the school district and the union to a degree not seen anywhere else.”

    Mr. Barr has not just used his charters to challenge the district. He is also an ally of Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, a Democrat who has also battled the Los Angeles school district, seeking mayoral control.

    The district superintendent , David L. Brewer III, met with Mr. Barr several times last spring to discuss his proposals for Locke, but those talks broke down.

    “Mr. Brewer has said he continues to be interested in partnering with Green Dot,” said Greg McNair, who leads the district’s charter school division.

    Green Dot is part of a new wave of nonprofit, high-performing charter chains that have grown rapidly with philanthropic financing, in Green Dot’s case especially from the Broad and the Bill & Melinda Gates foundations. Others include the Kipp Schools, in 18 states, and Achievement First, with 12 schools in New York and New Haven, said Ted Mitchell, head of the NewSchools Venture Fund, a San Francisco group that works with several chains.

    Mr. Mitchell said that only Green Dot was mounting such an aggressive challenge to the local school board. “Many charter organizations try to induce different behavior by providing examples of good new schools,” he said. “But only Green Dot is trying to provoke a school district to behave in radically different ways.”

    Some people voice skepticism about Green Dot’s methods. Clint Bolick, a lawyer who has represented many charter schools, said: “If union bosses start patrolling their hallways, that’ll be the death knell of charters, as it has been for public schools. There has to be a genuine perestroika for Green Dot’s approach to work.”

    Tactics aside, the chain has had promising results. An early high school that Green Dot founded, Ànimo Inglewood, has raised the percent of students proficient in math by 40 points since 2003, and 79 percent of its students from the class of 2006 went on to college. Green Dot keeps enrollment in its high schools below 525. Incoming freshmen who need it remedial tutoring get it, and thereafter pursue a college-prep curriculum.

    Three years ago, Mr. Barr negotiated with district officials about overhauling Jefferson High School, a dropout factory in downtown Los Angeles. When the talks bogged down, Mr. Barr concluded he needed clout.

    Green Dot organized a parents union, and its members, buttonholing neighbors in supermarkets and churches, collected 10,000 signatures endorsing Jefferson’s division into several smaller charter schools.

    Mr. Barr marched from Jefferson High with nearly 1,000 parents to deliver the petition to district headquarters. The authorities refused to relinquish Jefferson, but the school board approved five new charters, which Green Dot inaugurated last fall, all near Jefferson and drawing students from it.

    Green Dot’s recent organizing suggests that many teachers are as frustrated as parents.

    Locke, designated a failing school for much of a decade, is awaiting its fourth principal in five years. This spring, Mr. Barr drew up a charter plan and began meeting with teachers to explain it. He envisioned using the Locke campus for smaller schools that emphasize college prep and give teachers more decision-making authority.

    He invited Frank Wells, Locke’s principal, to tour a Green Dot charter in May, a day on which Education Secretary Margaret Spellings would be visiting. Before parents, teachers and the secretary, Mr. Wells denounced the district as using Locke as a dumping ground for incompetent teachers.

    “I went to Locke thinking I could turn it around, but I ran into a brick wall,” Mr. Wells said.

    On May 7, teachers began circulating a petition endorsing Green Dot’s plan for Locke, and more than half of Locke’s 73-member tenured staff members signed. Bruce Smith, an English teacher who gathered signatures, said most young teachers were eager to sign; older teachers were reluctant.

    “Among the people who opposed us, nobody said, ‘The district is doing a great job here,’ ” Mr. Smith recalled. “It was mostly, ‘What about our job security?’ ”

    The district authorities accused Mr. Wells of fomenting the revolt, dispatched guards to escort him from the building, and dismissed him, Mr. Wells said. Binti Harvey, a district spokeswoman, declined to discuss Mr. Wells.

    A decision by Locke’s teachers to break with the district would be an embarrassment for the school district and the teachers union. Both began lobbying the teachers. Last month, the district rejected Green Dot’s petition, saying 17 teachers had withdrawn their endorsement, leaving it without the majority necessary to comply with a charter conversion law.

    But a newly elected board of education is to reconsider the petition in August.

    Mr. Barr says that if he does not win the chance to use the Locke campus for his new charter schools, he will surround it with Green Dot’s next 10 charter schools, which are to open nearby in 2008, supported by a $7.8 million donation from the Gates Foundation.

    “If the district doesn’t work with me, I’ll compete with them and take their kids,” Mr. Barr said.

    NY Times: Focus on 2 R’s Cuts Time for the Rest, Report Says by Sam Dillon...

    Focus on 2 R’s Cuts Time for the Rest, Report Says - New York Times:

    Almost half the nation’s school districts have significantly decreased the daily class time spent on subjects like science, art and history as a result of the federal No Child Left Behind law’s focus on annual tests in reading and math, according to a new report released yesterday.

    The report, by the Center on Education Policy, a Washington group that studies the law’s implementation in school districts nationwide, said that about 44 percent of districts have cut time from one or more subjects or activities in elementary schools to extend time for longer daily math and reading lessons. Among the subjects or activities getting less attention since the law took effect in 2002 are science, social studies, art and music, gym, lunch and recess, the report said.

    The report, based on a survey of nearly 350 of the nation’s 15,000 districts, said 62 percent of school districts had increased daily class time in reading and math since the law took effect.

    Within a year of the law’s implementation, teachers and their associations were reporting that schools and districts were suggesting or requiring that they spend more time on reading and math to improve test scores, and that they cut back time spent on other disciplines.

    The narrowing of the nation’s elementary school curriculum has been significant, according to the report, but may not be affecting as many schools as previously thought.

    A report that the center issued in March 2006, based on a similar survey, gave one of the first measures of the extent of the narrowing trend. It said 71 percent of districts had reduced elementary school instruction in at least one other subject to make more time for reading and mathematics. That finding attracted considerable attention, with many groups opposed to the law decrying the trend.

    The law’s backers, including Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings, argued that the intensification of English and math instruction made good sense on its own because, they said, students who could not read or calculate with fluency would flounder in other subjects, too.

    The center’s new report raises the question of how to explain the considerable discrepancy between last year’s finding, that 71 percent of districts had reduced instructional time in subjects other than math and reading, and this year’s, which gives the number as 44 percent.

    Jack Jennings, the center’s president, said in an interview that the discrepancy was a result of a change in the wording of the questionnaire. Last year’s survey asked districts to say whether they had reduced instructional time in subjects other than reading and math “to a great extent,” “somewhat,” “minimally” or “not at all.” Districts that reported even minimally reduced instructional time on other subjects were included in the 71 percent, along with districts that carried out more substantial changes, Mr. Jennings said.

    This year, the center listed English/language arts and math as well as social studies, art and music, science and other subjects on the survey, and asked districts whether class time in each had increased, stayed the same or decreased since the law’s enactment. In a second column, the survey asked districts to indicate the number of minutes by which instructional time had increased or decreased.

    Districts that made only small reductions this year, 10 minutes a day or less, in the time devoted to courses other than reading or math, may have chosen to report that instructional time had remained the same, Mr. Jennings said. On last year’s survey, the same districts may instead have acknowledged reducing the time, while characterizing the reduction as minimal, he said.

    According to the new survey, the average change in instructional time in elementary schools since the law’s enactment has been 140 additional minutes per week for reading, 87 additional minutes per week for math, 76 fewer minutes per week for social studies, 75 fewer minutes for science, 57 fewer minutes for art and 40 fewer minutes for gym.

    In a statement, Secretary Spellings said the report’s scope was “too limited to draw broad conclusions.”

    “In fact,” she said, “there is much evidence that shows schools are adding time to the school day in order to focus on reading and math, not cutting time from other subjects.”

    Monday, July 23, 2007

    AfterDowningStreet.org: Impeach George Bush to Stop War Lies, Deaths

    Impeach George Bush to stop war lies, deaths | AfterDowningStreet.org:

    by Jimmy Breslin
    Newsday
    Sunday, July 22, 2007

    I am walking in Rosedale on this day early in the week while I wait for the funeral of Army soldier Le Ron Wilson, who died at age 18 in Iraq. He was 17 1/2 when he had his mother sign his enlistment papers at the Jamaica recruiting office. If she didn't, he told her, he would just wait for the months to his 18th birthday and go in anyway. He graduated from Thomas Edison High School at noon one day in May. He left right away for basic training. He came home in a box last weekend. He had a fast war.

    The war was there to take his life because George Bush started it with bold-faced lies.

    He got this lovely kid killed by lying.

    If Bush did this in Queens, he would be in court on Queens Boulevard on a murder charge.

    He did it in the White House, and it is appropriate, and mandatory for the good of the nation, that impeachment proceedings be started. You can't live with lies. You can't permit them to be passed on as if it is the thing to do.

    Yesterday, Bush didn't run the country for a couple of hours while he had a colonoscopy at the presidential retreat, Camp David. He came out of it all right. He should now take his good health and go home, quit a job he doesn't have a clue as to how to do.

    The other day, Bush said he couldn't understand why in the world would some people say that millions of Americans have no health insurance. "Why, all they have to do is go to the emergency room," he said.

    Said this with the smirk, the insolent smug, contemptuous way he speaks to citizens.

    People, particularly these politicians, these frightened beggars in suits, seem petrified about impeachment. It could wreck the country. Ridiculous. I've been around this business twice and we're all still here and no politician was even injured. Richard Nixon lied during a war and helped get some 58,500 Americans killed and many escaped by hanging onto helicopter skids. Nixon left peacefully. Mike Mansfield of Montana, the Democratic Senate majority leader, said on television that the Senate impeachment trial of Nixon would be televised and there would be no immunity. That meant Nixon would have to face the country under oath and if he lied he would go to prison. He knew he was finished as he heard this. Mansfield said no more. He got up and left. Barbara Walters, on the "Today" show, said, "He doesn't say very much, does he?"

    The second time the subject was Bill Clinton for illegal holding in the hallway.

    This time, we have dead bodies involved. Consider what is accomplished by the simple power of the word impeachment. If you read these broken-down news writers or terrified politicians claiming that an impeachment would leave the nation in pieces, don't give a moment to them.

    It opens with the appointing of an investigator to report to the House on evidence that calls for impeachment. He could bring witnesses forward. That would be all you'd need. Here in the impeachment proceedings against Richard Nixon came John Dean. His history shows how far down the honesty and honor of this country has gone. Dean was the White House counsel. Richard Nixon, at his worst, never told him not to appear or to remain silent in front of the Congress. Dean went on and did his best to fill prisons. After that came Alexander Butterfield, a nobody. All he had to say was that the White House had a taping system that caught all the conversations in the White House. Any of them not on tape were erased by a participant.

    The same is desperately needed now. Curious, following the words, an investigator - the mind here sees George Mitchell and Warren Rudman, and you name me better - can slap a hand on the slitherers and sneaks who have kept us in war for five years and who use failing generals to beg for more time and more lives of our young. A final word in September? Two years more, the generals and Bush people say.

    Say impeachment and you'll get your troops home.

    As I am walking in Rosedale, on these streets sparkling with sun, I remember the places I have been in the cold rain for the deaths of our young in this war. Rosedale now, Washington Heights before, and the South Bronx, and Bay Shore and Hauppauge and too many other places around here.

    And in Washington we had this Bush, and it is implausible to have anyone who is this dumb running anything, smirking at his country. He sure doesn't mind copying those people. On his PBS television show the other night, Bill Moyers said he was amazed at Sara Taylor of the White House staff saying that she didn't have to talk to a congressional committee because George Bush had ordered her not to. "I took an oath to uphold the president," she said.

    That president had been in charge of a government that kidnapped, tortured, lied, intercepted mail and calls, all in the name of opposing people who are willing to kill themselves right in front of you. You have to get rid of a government like this. Ask anybody in Rosedale, where Le Ron Wilson wanted to live his young life. His grave speaks out that this is an impeachable offense.

    Saturday, July 21, 2007

    NY Times: Chancellor Answers Critics on School Financing Data by Jennifer Medina...

    Read original...

    Seeking to placate critics who want details of how the city’s schools will use an influx of new state money, Chancellor Joel I. Klein released figures yesterday that showed District 27 in Queens as the big winner, receiving more than $14 million. Much of the money — $10 million — will go toward reducing class size.

    New York City won increased educational aid this year, the result of a legal battle over school financing. Gov. Eliot Spitzer and legislators agreed to a plan that sent an additional $1.03 billion to schools, with about $700 million coming from the state and $300 million from the city.

    A portion of the money — $258 million — must be used for set goals like reducing class sizes, improving teacher quality and increasing instructional time. The city, like other school systems statewide, must submit a plan to the state for approval. The legislation also requires that the districts spend the money “predominantly” on schools that show poor performance or have large clusters of low-income students.

    The city this month said that it would use nearly half the funds to reduce class sizes. Detailed figures released by the city yesterday showed how much extra financing school districts and individual schools would receive, but still did not specify where class sizes would be cut. Critics say the distribution raises the question of whether schools that are relatively high-performing are getting too much of the money.

    “There is certainly going to be a lot more back and forth, because this just is not going to fly,” Meryl Tisch, a member of the State Board of Regents, said of the city’s plan. “The point of this money is to drive it to those kids who need it the most.”

    But Chancellor Klein has adamantly defended the plan, saying that nearly every school in New York City has a number of students in poverty or at risk of failure.

    “You’ve got to look at this in the real world and in the big picture,” the chancellor said. “There are students with needs everywhere, and we have to give money to all students, not just some students.” He said that the money has been directed to schools with high poverty rates and that the “overwhelming majority” of the money would be spent there.

    The plan is unlikely to quiet those who say that the city is not focusing the new funds on the city’s lowest-performing schools. Critics yesterday pointed out that District 2 on the Upper East Side, one of the highest performing districts in the city, is getting more than $6 million.

    “We believe that the money was intended to serve the lowest-performing students in the neediest schools,” said Geri Palast, the executive director of the Campaign for Fiscal Equity, a group that sued the state for more money for New York City schools. “This just isn’t that, as far as we can tell.”

    Other districts getting large influxes of new funds are District 9 in the Bronx, $8.6 million, and District 10 in the Bronx, nearly $9 million.

    Even within districts, the distribution of funds varies widely. In District 27, in Queens, Public School 124 in Ozone Park will receive about $525,000. A few miles away, Public School 108 will receive more than $1.4 million in new state money, more than any other city school. But in both schools, more than two-thirds of the students perform at grade level and about 70 percent of the students are at the poverty level. While P.S. 108 will receive far more money, lower-grade classes there are already smaller than at neighboring P.S. 124. — an average of 21.8 students compared with 23.5.

    The plan was submitted to Albany late Monday night after a week of public hearings. It will set the stage for negotiations with the State Education Department, which has until mid-August to approve the plan.

    Forbes: Spitzer Said to Seek More Racetrack Bids

    Read original @ Forbes.com:

    "NEW YORK - The pool of entrants in a hotly contested bid to operate three upstate New York race tracks may get bigger, according to a report on Wednesday.

    Governor Eliot Spitzer is looking for new proposals for the franchise that runs the Saratoga, Aqueduct and Belmont racetracks, according to a report in the New York Daily News.

    Spitzer has previously suggested the franchise could be split, with one group running racing and another running video slot machines at Aqueduct and Belmont.

    A call to Spitzer's office seeking comment was not immediately returned.

    The New York Racing Association currently operates the franchise, but its contract expires on Dec. 31.

    NYRA is looking to keep the tracks, but has faced competition from Empire Racing, Excelsior Racing Associates and Capital Play.

    Empire Racing's members include Churchill Downs Inc. (nasdaq: CHDN - news - people ), Magna Entertainment Corp. (nasdaq: MECA - news - people ), Delaware North Cos., Woodbine Entertainment Group and Scientific Games Corp. (nasdaq: SGMS - news - people )

    Steve Wynn, chief executive of Wynn Resorts Ltd. (nasdaq: WYNN - news - people ), is part of Excelsior's team. Others in the group include Steven Roth of Vornado Realty Trust (nyse: VNO - news - people ) and Richard D. Bronson of The Bronson Cos."

    Times Ledger: CDEC 27 Revs up for Restructuring by Howard Koplowitz..

    Times Ledger - CDEC 27 revs up for restructuring:

    Members of Community District Education Council 27 agreed Monday to double their meetings to twice a month in October and November to brace for confusion stemming from the city Department of Education's restructuring taking effect in the upcoming school year.

    Under the restructuring, the city's 10 regions will be eliminated and principals will have these options:

    ¥Designate their school as an "empowerment school," where principals have autonomy over their school budget and curriculum,

    ¥Team up with not-for-profit or for-profit organizations that will supply the school with support services or

    Join one of four Learning Support Organizations, which will be headed by four former superintendents who will have their own support resources.

    Newly appointed CDEC 27 member Margaret Kearns-Stanley said one of her children's schools informed her of which option it had chosen while other schools were not as forthcoming.

    Other CDEC members said parents may be confused or will simply not know which route their child's school has chosen.

    "I envision the worst and the worst is [the CDEC] will have a lot of parents calling you next month," said David Hooks, a council member who made the suggestion to double up on the meetings in October and November. "I envision a lot of problems."

    "I'm concerned about how the children are going to make this adjustment and how the teachers will make this adjustment... there are a lot of questions out there. We need to do whatever we can to allay those fears."

    There are six returning members to the CDEC this year and five new additions. CDEC 27 President Andrew Baumann asked the newly appointed members why they decided to join the council.

    Far Rockaway resident Coralanne Griffith-Hunte, a new coucil member who has three children attending public school, said she wanted to be a conduit between schools and parents.

    "There is such a disconnect between the parents and their children's education," Griffith-Hunte said.

    John Patrick Larkin of Rockaway Park, also a new council member, said he "just wanted to better the situation for the children in the district, including my son."

    "I wanted to make sure parents have a say in their child's future," he said.

    The district covers Howard Beach, Ozone Park, South Ozone Park and the Rockaways.

    In other business, Baumann said Schools Chancellor Joel Klein is scheduled to meet with council presidents Aug. 1 at Public Advocate Betsy Gautbam's office.

    Baumann said Gotbaum's office was chosen as "neutral territory" because he said council presidents felt intimidated to speak during meetings at the city DOE's headquarters.

    "People in the Department of Education would be sitting behind us e-mailing their bosses on their little BlackBerries," Baumann said.

    New York Times Blog: 18-Year-Old G.I. From Queens, Killed in Iraq, Is Laid to Rest by Sewell Chan...

    Read original at the New York Times Blog:


    Pfc. Le Ron A. Wilson, an 18-year-old from Queens who was one of the youngest American servicemen to be killed since the war in Iraq began in 2003, was buried today in Farmingdale, on Long Island, after a funeral Mass at Christ the King Church in Springfield Gardens, Queens, The Associated Press reports.

    Private Wilson was killed on July 6 when his Humvee was hit with a roadside bomb on patrol in Baghdad. Trained as a weapons mechanic, he was assigned to Third Infantry Division but had volunteered for a weeklong patrol with the 3-7 Cavalry. He was posthumously awarded a Bronze Star and a Purple Heart.

    In a dispatch today from Iraq, The Daily News reports on the sorrow of Private Wilson’s fellow soldiers. They said Private Wilson, who is survived by his mother and a 5-year-old brother, grew up poor and believed he could provide for his mother through a career in the military:

    “She had a wonderful son,” said Spec. Blake Blann, 22, of Texarkana, Ark., who was Wilson’s roommate at Fort Stewart, Ga. “He was always doing the right thing and making sure everyone else was, too.”

    Private Wilson’s father was from Trinidad and Tobago and served in its military. Private Wilson enlisted at age 17, which required his mother’s permission, shortly after graduating from Thomas Edison High School. NY1 reports on the memories of some of Private Wilson’s friends from New York, and WCBS-TV quotes his aunt, Anne Marie Charles, describing him as “a loving child.”

    Jim Dwyer is writing a column for The Times, to be published on Wednesday, about Private Wilson’s funeral.

    NY1: Report: City Public Schools Raking In Million In Private Funds


    Watch video...



    City public schools are reportedly raking in private contributions.

    The New York Post says the city school system cashed in about $80 million in donations for fiscal year 2007.

    The paper says about $34 million of it came from the non-profit organization Fund for Public Schools. The other $46 million came from grants provided by other non-profit groups.

    In the fiscal year that ended June 30th, the fund reportedly received more than 700 gifts, including donations from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, The Michael and Susan Dell Foundation and The Broad Foundation.

    NY1: Funeral Held For Queens Soldier Killed In Iraq

    Watch video...

    Motorcycles roared onto 145th Road in Brookville Tuesday, leading the funeral procession for 18-year-old Private Le Ron Wilson, who was killed in Iraq on July 6th when his vehicle hit an explosive device.

    "He was a great kid, always outgoing, always willing to do anything., really fun to hang out with,” said Wilson’s friend Vernon Cruz.

    "Someone so young, so close to us, who hung out with us, you know, this happens, and you don't know how to take it, you just gotta keep moving forward, that’s about it,” said another friend Daniel Rafael.

    Hundreds of mourners made their way into Christ the King church to remember Wilson, who came to New York from Trinidad at the age of 11.

    For his 17th birthday, he asked his mother to sign enlistment papers for the army, and she did it.

    He joined up after graduation from Thomas Edison High School.

    "We all told him not to go, but he still went,” said Wilson’s aunt Anne Marie Charles. “That was his choice."

    Wilson followed in the footsteps of his father, a Cadet Force Major in Trinidad.

    "I'm very proud of him. I don't want his name to just be a name hanging on a wall. I want him to live on,” said Wilson’s father Lawrence Wilson. “I've been promised by a couple people that they're going to do whatever they can to keep his name living on and that's what I hope. I'm going to fight every fight possible to ensure that his name lives on. He didn't die for no reason. He died for a cause.”

    Le Ron Wilson was posthumously awarded the Good Conduct, Bronze Star and Purple Heart medals.

    Wilson will be buried with full military honors at Long Island National Cemetery.

    NY1: Critics Argue Against Klein's Class-Size Reduction Plan by Michael Meehan...

    Watch video...

    July 20, 2007

    Come September, city schools are supposed to get a huge cash infusion when the state makes good for shortchanging city schools for decades. But now, some advocates are worried the city's Department of Education will not spend the new money in the best way for school kids. NY1 Education reporter Michael Meenan filed the following report.

    Creating smaller classes is supposed to be a big part of how the city spends hundreds of millions of dollars in increased state aid. It's a requirement mandated by Albany, and it can't come too soon says one high school student.

    "If it's like 32 students, the class goes like out of control,” said student Jose Araujo. “It's too many students for the teacher."

    School Chancellor Joel Klein agrees that students do better when classes are smaller. But he says he has already shrunk classes. He maintains there's now an average of 25 students to a teacher in city high schools and in the early grades it’s even lower.

    Klein says he wants to target $141 million of the new state money for further class-size reduction, especially in middle schools where many classes are 30 kids or more per teacher.

    But the teacher's union says classes need to be 20 kids per teacher and Klein's class-size reduction plan, based on school-by-school reviews, falls way too short.

    "It was not supposed to be an amalgam of what principals wish lists were, school by school, and they put it together and give it to the state,” said United Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten.

    Klein argues that principals know best.

    "We've got some schools where they're going to put two teachers in a class of 30,” said Klein. “They may not have the room to break up the class into two of 15. That's class-size reduction, maybe not in the view of some who want 20 in every class, which is not a real-word view in our context."

    To prove how serious it is about reducing class sizes, the DOE says it's going to send in a team of specialists to 72 schools in September to teach administrators how to reduce class sizes.

    The DOE is letting the leaders at one Chinatown junior high, where there are 30 students per class, decide what to do. But the group that brought the lawsuit that forced the state to provide the cash infusion says Klein's approach risks losing a chance for real class-size reduction.

    "We need to get to a greater level of specificity beyond saying there will be coaching and supportive services,” said Geri Palast of the Campaign for Fiscal Equity.

    The state education commissioner has the final say on whether or not the DOE's class-size reduction plan meets their approval. A decision is expected in mid August.

    -Michael Meenan

    NY1: Councilman Gallagher Lays Low Amidst Allegations Of Rape by Molly Kroon...

    Watch video...

    It's been a rough couple of weeks for Queens City Councilman Dennis Gallagher as accusations swirled that he raped a woman in his Middle Village neighborhood. Friday, Gallagher and his attorney answered some questions about the allegations. NY1’s Molly Kroon filed the following report.

    City Councilman Dennis Gallagher has been laying low these days, refusing to come out of his Queens home he shares with his wife and two children to talk to a reporter.

    He spoke to a NY1 reporter through the door.

    "I have faith in the system,” said Gallagher. “I feel in the end I will be vindicated and I just ask that people don't jump to any conclusions."

    Gallagher is facing some serious accusations – a woman who lives just a few blocks from the councilman says he raped her earlier this month. Authorities say that Gallagher met the woman at a neighborhood bar, Danny Boys, just steps from his family's home and less than a mile away from his district office on Metropolitan Avenue.

    The woman alleges that Gallagher raped her in an office upstairs. Police searched the building for evidence the following day.

    Gallagher has since given DNA samples to the police, but his attorney, Stephen Mahler, says he is innocent.

    "He vehemently denies any criminal wrong doing," said Mahler.

    The Queens district attorney would not comment on the case, but sources say a grand jury will be convened to look at the evidence – and could come back with a decision next week.

    Mahler, however, downplayed the significance and said his client would not testify if called.

    "It's really indicative of nothing that you're having a grand jury investigation," said Mahler.

    Still, the allegations have shocked many in the community.

    "He's with his family all the time,” said one local resident. “That's all he cares about, his family."

    "Personally, I can say he's like the best guy in this whole neighborhood,” said another. “I can say that."

    Gallagher was first elected back in 2001– one of just three Republicans on the council. Before that, he was chief of staff for former Council Minority Leader Tom Ognibene and was an investigator for the state Crime Victim’s Board.

    Whether he's absolved of the allegations or not, Gallagher's attorney fears that the councilman’s reputation – and career – may be tarnished.

    "I think all public officials are fearful of that,” he said. “Even private individuals, people not in public life, are fearful of such taint. It's something that is hard to undo it once it's done."

    The full City Council meets next Wednesday. The question is if Gallagher will be there, as well.

    -Molly Kroon