Saturday, May 14, 2011
STATEMENT BY PUBLIC ADVOCATE DE BLASIO ON MAYOR BLOOMBERG PICKING NISSAN TO BE TAXI OF TOMORROW
Tuesday, May 3, 2011
Statement by Public Advocate Bill de Blasio on Mayor Bloomberg Picking Nissan to be Taxi of Tomorrow
Wednesday, March 9, 2011
Borough Taxis Draws Boos at Meeting by Steve Mosco - The Queens Courier
However, that might soon change as a new law proposed by Mayor Michael Bloomberg aims to create an outer borough cab service for passengers in Brooklyn, the Bronx, Staten Island and Queens. The livery cab type service would do away with the need for unlicensed – and in some cases, unsafe – ‘gypsy cabs,’ which are usually the only outer borough option.
David Yassky, who heads the Taxi and Limousine Commission (TLC), is charged with implementing the plan that Bloomberg unveiled back in January.
The bill requires a vote from the City Council and, if passed, would equip For-Hire Base Station vehicles with meters, allowing them to pick up random fares. Borough taxis will be assigned a uniform color separate from yellow taxis along with GPS locators, meters and the option for customers to pay by credit card as well as cash. The fare structure will be determined
“While the system works pretty well in Manhattan, there is enormous room for improvement in the rest of the city,” said Yassky. “That's what this plan should accomplish.”
At a Community Board 10 (CB10) meeting on March 3, TLC representatives gave attendees a general overview of the proposal – many residents did not like what they heard and voiced their disapproval, stating that there are safety concerns as well as concerns that they already have with TLC transportation in the area.
“Before we get involved with another layer of cabs, we need to deal with the ones we have now,” said Betty Braton, CB10 chairman, who stated that current issues include problematic routes and off-street parking locations.
TLC is looking for passenger feedback on what customers would want to see from the borough taxis. A short survey can be found at: http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/NYCTaxiSurvey.
The Metropolitan Transportation Authority declined to comment on this story.
Tuesday, February 1, 2011
Futuristic Glass Roof Cab Could Soon Be Reality on NYC Streets by Pete Donohue - NY Daily News
Thursday, July 1, 2010
Police Crack Down on Chatty Drivers by Stephen Geffon - Leader-Observer
On Tuesday, June 22, at the stroke of midnight, police officers from the 102nd and 106th precincts along with officers citywide began a 24-hour crackdown on the use of hand-held cell phones while driving as part the NYPD's focus on traffic infractions linked to death and injury.
Police officials said that officers issued 4,527 summonses across the five boroughs to drivers who were chatting while driving during the 24-hour time frame The 106th Precinct alone issued 27 summonses for this violation. The number of summonses issued by officers of the 102nd Precinct was not available at press time.
Similar efforts from earlier this year resulted in 6,882 summonses handed out on March 25, and 7,485 summonses on January 21, according to NYPD statistics.
Individuals using hand-held cell phones while driving in the city face a fine of $130 ($200 for taxi drivers). Drivers can be fined $150 for text-messaging, though a ticket can only be issued as a secondary offense when a driver gets pulled over for another violation.
Exempt from the crackdown were drivers using their phone to call 911 and those who use hand-free options – their cell phone’s speakerphone feature, wired or wireless Bluetooth headsets, or the Bluetooth connectivity now built into GPS devices.
According to the NYPD, during 2009, police issued on average 617 summonses a day to drivers using hand-held cell phones, a total of 195,579 for the year. On previous crackdowns, NYPD-issued tickets for phoning while driving surpassed the daily average. On October 22, 2009, 7,529 summonses were issued for this infraction, and on August 21, 2009, 7,432 tickets were issued.
In addition to being illegal, “driving while talking on a cell phone is dangerous and endangers both drivers and pedestrians,” the NYPD said in a statement. A police spokesperson added, “it has just been demonstrated that motorists distracted by holding a cell phone while driving and speaking on a hand-held cell phone while driving has led to accidents, including fatalities.”
A University of Utah study found that drivers who talk on their cell phones, or even use a hand-free device, are as impaired as drunken drivers.
Frank Dardani, president of the 106th Precinct Community Council, said the cell phone enforcement shouldn’t be just for one day, “it should be everyday.” Dardani added that in addition to talking on a cell phone, other distractions such as putting on makeup, eating lunch while driving, and drinking hot coffee also pose the danger of an accident.
“Distracted driving in itself should be addressed (by police) on a daily basis,” he added.
Assemblywoman Audrey Pheffer said, "crashes due to driver inattention or distraction are all too common and result in far too many tragedies. Drivers must be focused on the road and not on their cell phone conversations. It is unfortunate that this has had to become a police enforcement priority due to people’s lack of compliance with the law.”
Taxi drivers in the city face even more stringent regulations issued by the Taxi and Limousine Commission (TLC). Last January, TLC announced new regulations prohibiting the use of all forms of distractive electronic devices for taxicabs, livery, black car, luxury limousine, commuter van, and para-transit vehicles.
“The time has come to put an end to the abuse of distracted driving by taxicab and for-hire vehicle drivers,” said TLC Commissioner Matthew Daus. “First and foremost it is a safety issue, but it is also a customer service issue when a driver’s concentration is split between his cell phone conversation, his driving, and his passenger. There is no reason to wait for a tragedy to occur before drivers get the message that such distractions are dangerous and entirely unacceptable.
“The new regulations create a true 'three strikes and you’re out' reality for TLC-licensed drivers by providing a framework by which their TLC licenses would be revoked for three violations within a 15-month period,” added Daus.
Wednesday, June 23, 2010
Commuter Van Wars Lead to Theft, Slashed Tires By Jaya Saxena - Gothamist

Licensed and unlicensed commuter vans have been slugging it out in the outer boroughs. Though there are over 300 licensed commuter van drivers shuttling passengers from one zone to the next, there are hundreds more unlicensed vans that snatch up commuters and don't pay insurance. Licensed drivers are accusing the unlicensed guys of cutting them off to pick up passengers, and even threatening them when they are confronted. One driver's van even got stolen!
Licensed driver David Clarke recently confronted an unlicensed driver in Rosedale. Though the driver stole Clarke's passenger, he felt it fitting to warn him, "Watch out, I know where you live." Three days later, Clarke's van was stolen from his home, and when police found it it was covered in scratches and missing its tire rims. Others have reported shattered windshields and slashed tires, and Driver Gladstone Barrett says the competition is ruthless. "I'm scared as hell. They say we’re trying to get rid of them, but we’re not trying to get rid of them. We just want them to follow the same requirements that we do." But in this economy, that price is just too damn high.
Unlicensed "dollar" van being ticketed and towed at Liberty Avenue & Crossbay Blvd by Taxi and Limousine Commission agents. Photo: Lost in the Ozone.
Driver Norman Morris was legit for 16 years, and between safety inspections and liability insurance, that little sticker from the TLC cost him $12,000 a year. "I wanted to be licensed, too, but I just can’t afford it." With the new cuts in subway and bus service, commuter vans are becoming even more popular in areas under served by public transportation, and more unlicensed drivers are starting to take advantage of the demand.
The rules [PDF] state that no one can operate a van service in the city "without first obtaining an authorization from the Commission to operate such commuter van service" or if they've been "found guilty of operating a commuter van service without authorization to operate such commuter van service two times within a six-month period." So trying to incorporate all those unlicensed drivers into the system won't really go over