Showing posts with label securities and exchange commission. Show all posts
Showing posts with label securities and exchange commission. Show all posts

Thursday, March 31, 2011

SEC Gives Shareholders a Voice on Corporate Campaign Spending by Ciara Torres-Spelliscy - Brennan Center for Justice

Read original...


The SEC has just issued an important post-Citizens United  no-action letter that will enhance the ability of shareholders to have more of a voice when publicly-traded corporations spend money on politics. In doing so, the SEC recognized that shareholder accountability over corporate political spending is a significant policy issue that can’t be barred from a proxy statement under the ordinary business exclusion.
The no-action letter came after Home Depot tried to keep a shareholder resolution on corporate political spending off of this year’s proxy statement. The SEC said the shareholders would get a chance to vote on the matter. This action provides shareholders with greater protections when corporations spend their money, in the form of general corporate funds, on politics.
The substance of the Home Depot proposal, submitted by NorthStar Asset Management Funded Pension Plan, is the following:
Shareholders recommend that the Board of Directors adopt a policy under which the proxy statement for each annual meeting will contain a proposal describing:
  • the company's policies on electioneering contributions,
  • any specific expenditures for electioneering communications known to be anticipated during the forthcoming fiscal year,
  • the total amount of such anticipated expenditures,
  • a list of electioneering expenditures made in the prior fiscal year, and
  • providing an advisory shareholder vote on those policies and future plans.
NorthStar’s supporting statement requested that management provide an analysis as to whether Home Depot’s political spending was in line with its values and policies, and any risks it might pose to the company’s reputation, brand, or shareholder value.
This shareholder proposal was based in part on draft legislation written by the Brennan Center last year which became the Shareholder Protection Act in the 111th Congress.
The SEC rejected all of Home Depot’s objections to the inclusion of this shareholder proposal on the 2011 proxy statement.
This SEC no-action letter means shareholders can assert self-help on a company-by-company basis, not just on transparency of political spending, but also on an advisory shareholder vote on such spending. This is a big step in the right direction for giving shareholders more protections after Citizens United allowed corporations the ability to spend other people’s money in politics.

Thursday, February 17, 2011

"Wall Street -The Untouchables" Exposing Wall Street’s Banks with Cenk Uyger - msnbc tv:

Watch video...

Rolling Stone's Matt Taibbi exposes how the government is doing more to protect the banks than prosecute them...


Read: Why Isn't Wall Street in Jail?
Financial crooks brought down the world's economy - but the feds are doing more to protect them than to prosecute them...

Monday, January 3, 2011

Ex-car Czar Steve Rattner Settles Pay-to-play Scandal by Dan Primack - Fortune

Read original...




After more than a year of wrangling, obfuscation and name-calling, Steven Rattner has effectively 'fessed up to having done wrong.
The former car czar and private equity boss today agreed to pay $10 million in restitution to the State of New York, for his role in the state's public pension kickback scandal. He also has agreed to refrain from "appearing in any capacity" before any New York pension fund for the next five years.
This follows Rattner's earlier deal with the SEC, under which he agreed to repay $6.2 million and agree to a two-year ban from the securities industry.
In an official statement, Rattner said:
"I am pleased to have reached a settlement with the New York Attorney General's Office, which allows me to put this matter behind me. I apologize if during the course of this process there is anything I did that may have made reaching this agreement more difficult. I respect the work of the Attorney General and his staff to ensure that the New York State Common Retirement Fund operates properly and in the best interests of New Yorkers."
That's a far cry from what Rattner said just last month:
While settling with the S.E.C. begins the process of putting this matter behind me, I will not be bullied simply because the attorney general's office prefers political considerations instead of a reasoned assessment of the facts.
This episode is the first time during 35 years in business that anyone has questioned my ethics or integrity — and I certainly did not violate the Martin Act. That's why I intend to clear my name by defending myself vigorously against this politically motivated lawsuit.
For the uninitiated, Rattner's restitution is based on his time as a co-founding partner of Quadrangle Group, a New York-based private equity firm that invested in media, communications and information services companies. Here's the rundown, based on legal filings (note, I'm cribbing what follows from earlier posts, because nothing in the settlement appears to alter the underlying allegations):
  • Rattner secured a video distribution deal for the brother of New York pension fund CIO David Loglisci, via a (now defunct) Quadrangle portfolio company. The deal was done over the initial objections of portfolio company management. Not only does this indicate pay-to-play, it also would seem to mean that Rattner violated his fiduciary obligations to Quadrangle limited partners (not letter of obligations, but spirit).
  • Rattner also helped connect Logiscli's brother with people at film channel IFC, in which Quadrangle was an investor.
  • Presumably at Loglisci's suggestion, Rattner secretly hired Hank Morris as a "placement agent," in order to secure a $100 million fund commitment for Quadrangle from the New York State Common Retirement Fund (it was later increased to $150m). This came after Quadrangle's legitimate placement agents had only been able to secure between $25 million and $50 million. Morris got Quadrangle the money without ever setting up or attending any meetings with CRF on Quadrangle's behalf.
  • Morris also helped get Quadrangle $75 million from New York City pension systems, via a third-party who since has pled guilty to securities fraud.
  • One of Loglisci's brothers put Rattner in touch with potential investors on the West Coast. These included Elliott Broidy, who sat on the board of the Los Angeles Fire & Police Pension Fund. LAFPPF committed $10 million to Quadrangle, and Broidy has since pled guilty to felony charges of rewarding official misconduct.
  • In 2006, Morris allegedly asked Rattner for a contribution to the reelection campaign of State Comptroller Alan Hevesi (Loglisci's boss, who last week pled guity to fraud). Rattner demurred, saying that he had a policy against making contributions to public officials with oversight over investments, Morris suggested that Rattner contribute the money via a third party. Soon after, Rattner tapped a Democratic donor who subsequently contributed approximately $25k to Hevesi (plus another $25k from the donor's wife). That donor was not identified in court documents, but appears to have been Haim Saban. A source tells me that Saban was unaware of Rattner's backroom shenanigans.
A few final thoughts on this story:
1. This could have been FAR worse for Rattner, and perhaps would have been were Cuomo not leaving the AG's office in just two days. Cuomo originally sought restitution of between $18 million and $20 million in private, and then bumped it up to $26 million in a pair of lawsuits (both dropped today, as part of the settlement). He also had precedent on his side, based on the $20 million shelled out by Riverstone Group founder David Leuschen, for other activities related to Hank Morris, New York pensions and the aforementioned film (a horrendous piece of dreck called "Chooch"). Finally, Cuomo also was seeking a lifetime securities industry ban.
Not only did Rattner get off relatively cheaply -- and never face possible criminal charges -- but he even got a bit of a PR boon by settling on a day when half of the world is on vacation (or still stuck at an airport, as the case may be).
2. On the other hand, the timing makes a bad week even worse for Mike Bloomberg. Hizzoner used to employ Rattner as his personal money manager, via a Quadrangle wealth management group, and still sort of does (the Quadrangle unit broke off into a new group with which Rattner is affiliated).
When asked about Rattner over the summer, Bloomberg said: "I don't think [Rattner] did anything wrong… I happen to think the charge against him is ridiculous... I've always stood up for anybody that works with me who gets attacked by the press." He has since stuck by his friend, refusing to cut ties with someone who has tacitly admitted to public corruption in Bloomberg's own state.
3. We've seen private equity kickback scandals in a variety of state pension systems, including California and New Mexico, but the New York affair was enabled by a sole fiduciary structure. It's not coincidence that the only other state with such a structure, Connecticut, was rocked by a similar scandal that ended up with its treasurer in prison. A bill was proposed last year to drop the single fiduciary in favor of a board structure, but went nowhere. It's almost as if New York legislators are begging for its public pensioners to again be defrauded.
4. Now that this is settled, here's hoping that Rattner will sit down to speak about the situation with an informed interviewer who sdoesn't mind asking hard questions. No, not you Charlie Rose. I'll officially throw my hat in the ring, but won't hold my breath...

Tuesday, October 12, 2010

Feds Link GOP Senate Hopeful Joe DioGuardi to Ponzi Firm by Kathleen Ludacamo

Read original...

Senate hopeful Joe DioGuardi has a history with a firm the feds say ran a $1.7B Ponzi scheme.



U.S. Senate hopeful Joe DioGuardi prides himself on his accounting expertise - but he has a history with a firm the feds say ran a $1.7 billion Ponzi scheme.
Medical Capital Holdings and its subsidiaries bilked investors out of $1 billion while sinking millions into a mega-yacht and Hollywood flop, a complaint filed last year by the Securities and Exchange Commission said.
From 2007 to 2009, the former Westchester Republican congressman was paid $5,000 a month as a consultant for the subsidiary Medical Capital Corp. - and also got $16,000 a year to sit on boards of various other MCH subsidiaries.
MCH managed the messy books for several of the companies involved in the so-called scheme and was named in the suit.
DioGuardi, a trained accountant, claims he was oblivious to any wrongdoing.
"As a consultant, Joe was tasked with saving hospitals in New York from being shut down, but knew nothing of the schemes that were occurring behind the scenes," said his spokesman Brian Hummell, adding that his boss "has never seen the books."
The SEC described DioGuardi, who faces incumbent Democrat Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand in next month's election, as an "old crony" of the company's bosses and suggested "he's connected to the original fraudulent scheme."
As of last November, thousands of investors were owed $1 billion. The feds froze the company's assets; the case is pending.
MCH moved last year to have DioGuardi replace a court-appointed manager of its assets, which include the $3.2 million yacht Home Stretch and the $18.1 million movie rights to the recent flick "The Perfect Game."
The SEC countered that he had a long history with the company, including sitting on the board of three subsidiaries.
"DioGuardi is not 'new' management at all, but rather an old crony of \[the management charged with fraud\] who has been on their payroll since at least 2004," prosecutors said.
Since the managers didn't tell the court about DioGuardi's background with the company, the SEC said their "attempt to hide their connections to so-called 'new' management shows that there is a genuine danger that 'new' management is connected to the original fraudulent scheme."
DioGuardi agreed to help the company reorganize to avoid bankruptcy after the SEC charges were disclosed, a campaign aide said. A judge denied MCH's request.
DioGuardi, a former CPA who served two terms in Congress, trails Gillibrand in most polls by double digits.
Gillibrand's spokesman Glen Caplin called DioGuardi's connection to MCH "the latest example of how the former big-spending congressman turned lobbyist . . . is completely wrong for New York."