Monday, May 16, 2011
Rep Joe Crowley Fights Republican Effort to Cut Unemployment Benefits for Millions of Americans
Tuesday, March 15, 2011
Assembly Member Mike Miller - Assembly Helps Thousands of Unemployed New Yorkers
Friday, February 11, 2011
House Dems To Reintroduce Longshot Bill For Long-Term Unemployed by Arthur Delaney - Huffington Post
Wednesday, February 9, 2011
Help is on the Way for the 99'ers - The Ed Schultz Show - msnbc.com
Ed Schutz gives his take on new legislation introduced by Rep Barbara Lee ad Rep Bobby Scott, which would give help to unemployed Americans for more than 99 weeks...
Friday, January 14, 2011
MoveOn.org Meeting with Congressman Joe Crowley on January 11th...
![]() |
| Standing from the right: Joe Sherman, Bill Krum, Rep Crowley, David Quintana and Joe Lauria - Seated: Raphael Schweizer, Zo Halton and Paco Lugovina - Click on image to enlarge |
- An extension of unemployment benefits for 99'ers and a federal job training bill to get american back to work...
- Green Energy Initatives to help America be a leader in clean energy policies and end our use of foreign oil...tied into this was the need to a new commitment to rebuilding our roads, bridges and infrastructure...
- An end to the endless wars in Iran and Afghanistan and to use the money towards domestic policies...
- A repeal of the onerous and Un-American Patriot Act...which goes against the Bill of Rights and numerous other Constitutional guaranteed rights of all Americans...
- Cleaning up federal campaigns including campaign finance reform, enactment of the Disclose Act and a repeal of the Citizen United bill...
- Comprehensive federal Gun Control and reenactment of the Assault Weapons Act and the Brady Bill...
- Healthcare reform including fighting back against the Republican's repeal of the recently passed bill and making it even more progressive with the inclusion of single payer option...
- We stressed the need for a comprehensive Immigration policy and to seek the passage of the Dream Act...
- Mental health issues were discussed in regard to the recent Gabrielle Giffords tragedy in Arizona...
![]() |
| Click on image to enlarge |
Tuesday, November 30, 2010
NY Needs More Aid for Unemployed, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand Says by Kenneth R.. Bazinet - NY Daily News
![]() |
| The legislative battle ahead won't be easy for Democrats, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand says. |
Wednesday, October 27, 2010
Unemployment Benefits: The 99ers - 60 Minutes - CBS News
"60 Minutes" and correspondent Scott Pelley went to several communities in search of the 99ers, but we didn't expect to find such a crisis in Silicon Valley, the high tech capital that many people hoped would be creating jobs.
If you want to understand why the economy is stalled, come to San Jose, Calif., and talk with 99ers like Marianne Rose. "I remember it coming close to like six months. I was saying, 'I can't believe I'm out of work this long.' Then the year mark hit. And I just started just panicking seriously. Now that it's over two years I can't believe it. I just, I can't believe it," she told Pelley.
Rose was a financial analyst at a real estate firm. Age 54, she's single with a grown daughter. After being laid off with about 100 co-workers, she spent her savings, lost her home and finally found herself sitting in a truck with her dog and all of her possessions.
She made a desperate call to a friend and found refuge upstairs in the home of strangers, her friend's brother and sister-in-law.
"How long did you think you would be in here?" Pelley asked.
"Two weeks really. That's all I thought," she replied.
But she told Pelley it has been six months. "And not really an end in sight, yet."
"What sort of things would you be willing to do at this point?" Pelley asked.
"Well, I can say that probably the lowest level position for me has been now to apply for a clerk, a county clerk and I just realized the competition is pretty stiff out there," she replied.
Asked what she meant by stiff competition, Rose explained, "There's a lot of people, speaking of the county. I had applied to those clerk positions. There's actually four positions that were open. I found there were over 2,000 people that applied for those four positions."
Rose is one of at least a million and a half Americans who've exhausted their unemployment checks.
Tuesday, July 6, 2010
Editorial - Who Will Fight for the Unemployed? - NYTimes.com
Without doubt, the two biggest threats to the economy are unemployment and the dire financial condition of the states, yet lawmakers have failed to deal intelligently with either one.
Federal unemployment benefits began to expire nearly a month ago. Since then, 1.2 million jobless workers have been cut off. The House passed a six-month extension as part of a broader spending bill in May, but the Senate, despite three attempts, has not been able to pass a similar bill. The majority leader, Harry Reid, said he was ready to give up after the third try last week when all of the Senate’s Republicans and a lone Democrat, Ben Nelson of Nebraska, blocked the bill.
Meanwhile, the states face a collective budget hole of some $112 billion, but neither the House nor the Senate has a plan to help. The House stripped a provision for $24 billion in state fiscal aid from its earlier spending bill. The Senate included state aid in its ill-fated bill to extend unemployment benefits; when that bill failed, the promise of aid vanished as well.
As a result, 30 states that had counted on the money to help balance their budgets will be forced to raise taxes even higher and to cut spending even deeper in the budget year that begins on July 1. That will only worsen unemployment, both among government workers and the states’ private contractors. Worsening unemployment means slower growth, or worse, renewed recession.
So if lawmakers are wondering why consumer confidence and the stock market are tanking (the Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index hit a new low for the year on Tuesday), they need look no further than a mirror.
The situation cries out for policies to support economic growth — specifically jobless benefits and fiscal aid to states. But instead of delivering, Congressional Republicans and many Democrats have been asserting that the nation must act instead to cut the deficit. The debate has little to do with economic reality and everything to do with political posturing. A lot of lawmakers have concluded that the best way to keep their jobs is to pander to the nation’s new populist mood and play off the fears of the very Americans whose economic well-being Congress is threatening.
Deficits matter, but not more than economic recovery, and not more urgently than the economic survival of millions of Americans. A sane approach would couple near-term federal spending with a credible plan for deficit reduction — a mix of tax increases and spending cuts — as the economic recovery takes hold.
But today’s deficit hawks — many of whom eagerly participated in digging the deficit ever deeper during the George W. Bush years — are not interested in the sane approach. In the Senate, even as they blocked the extension of unemployment benefits, they succeeded in preserving a tax loophole that benefits wealthy money managers at private equity firms and other investment partnerships. They also derailed an effort to end widespread tax avoidance by owners of small businesses organized as S-corporations. If they are really so worried about the deficit, why balk at these evidently sensible ways to close tax loopholes and end tax avoidance?
House lawmakers made an effort on Tuesday to extend jobless benefits but failed to get the necessary votes, and it remains uncertain if an extension can pass both the House and Senate before Congress leaves town on Friday for a weeklong break. What’s needed, and what’s lacking, is leadership, both in Congress and from the White House, to set the terms of the debate — jobs before deficit reduction — and to fight for those terms, with failure not an option.
Monday, June 28, 2010
Why Jobless Deserve Our Help: Those Opposing More Aid to Unemployed Aren't Cold - They're Ignorant by Errol Lewis - NY Daily News
I agree, they're either ignorant or just plain mean...
Read original...
Like most national debacles lately, the decision by Congress to let unemployment relief lapse for more than a million Americans was a bipartisan disaster. Senate Republicans, joined by Democrat Ben Nelson of Nebraska, voted "no" on an extension of aid to 1.2 million of their countrymen who have been jobless for six months, a number predicted to increase to 2 million by year's end.
The Democratic majority, falling three votes short of the 60 needed to pass a $40 billion extension measure, caved in to the threat of a filibuster and let the measure fail.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid could have played hardball by forcing his opponents to conduct a true filibuster and tie up Senate business with long speeches about why the long-term jobless should be left to struggle on their own.
But Reid didn't force the issue, which is too bad. Our nation is long overdue for a full debate over the obvious need for deficit spending to snap us out of our economic doldrums.
Mainstream economics holds that accelerated government spending at times like this can shorten a downturn and speed recovery.
Government, according to this view, can help by providing enough temporary cash - through contracts with the private sector, unemployment relief, military spending and the like - to tide over the private sector until demand picks up.
In our consumer-driven economy, providing the jobless with a minimal allowance - just over $300 a week, on average - supplies families with cash that immediately gets spent on rent, food, medicine, gasoline and other necessities.
The idea is to contain the misery so that an unemployed person's plight doesn't spread like wildfire to a local hardware shop, grocery store and landlord, causing a prolonged slump.
Deficit hawks who are urging government to shut off the spigot now either don't understand this, or they don't care.
After turning a surplus into a $9 trillion debt during the years of the Bush presidency, GOP legislators have experienced an election-year conversion to fiscal tightness.
In the minds of these hawks, the abstract idea of the government spending too much outweighs stimulating recovery or alleviating the desperation of the long-term unemployed.
Even worse than cutting off benefits after 26 weeks of unemployment is the refusal to even consider extending additional aid to the so-called 99ers, the hundreds of thousands of Americans who have been jobless for 99 weeks and - after several emergency extensions - are ineligible for any more unemployment checks. New York has over 65,000 of them.
"I am fluent in Spanish, have a national security clearance with the FBI, ICE, DHS & DEA and years of experience in customer service," wrote Connie Kaplan, a 99er who publicized her plight on the Rochester Unemployment Examiner, a Web site by and for the jobless."I'm told I'm overqualified or simply never hear back from prospective employers," Kaplan wrote. "I'm now headed onto the road of losing my place of residence for lack of income. Food is gotten from food banks and each day brings me closer to total disaster."
Cries like Kaplan's have fallen on deaf ears in Washington. Beyond the purely fiscal issues lie ugly assumptions about who has lost a job and why.
At the height of the recent debate, Republican Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah offered a crackpot proposal to drug test the unemployed and cut off benefits to anybody testing positive.
"A lot of people are saying, 'Hey, it's about time. Why do we keep giving money to people who are going to go use it on drugs instead of their families?'" Hatch told the Huffington Post, citing no studies, hearings or data to support his idea - and dodging a question about what might happen if members of Congress were subjected to the same scrutiny.
It turns out that drug testing benefit recipients was tried in Michigan a decade ago. Officials dropped the idea after an expensive and cumbersome process of screening 238 welfare applicants turned up only 21 who tested positive for drugs (all but three of them for smoking pot).
Reid and the Democrats must stage a high-profile public debate that puts every member of Congress on the record about whether it makes sense to fill the nation's homeless shelters and welfare offices with millions who are ready, willing and able to get back to work, resume paying taxes and get about the business of lifting the nation out of recession.
Thursday, June 24, 2010
As Long-Term Unemployment Deepens, 99ers Look for Answers By Annie Lowrey - The Washington Independent
Cindy Paoletti's home-state senators, Charles Schumer and Kirsten Gillibrand, have indicated they might be willing to extend unemployment benefits beyond 99 weeks. (EPA/ZUMAPRESS.com)For 23 years, 58-year-old Cindy Paoletti of Salina, N.Y., worked in the corporate accounting division of J.P. Morgan Chase, balancing payroll accounts in an upstate office of the Wall Street bank. In December 2007, Paoletti was let go in a wave of layoffs that eventually shuttered the entire Syracuse operations center. “My job went to India,” she sighs.
Soon after, she started collecting unemployment benefits and severance while searching for a job in earnest. “I apply for everything out there,” she says, estimating she has applied to hundreds of positions over the past 30 months. “But 95 percent of the time, the company you send your resume to does not even acknowledge that they’ve received it. The majority of the time, if you do get an interview, they tell you that you are overqualified. It seems like as soon as they find out your age, everything goes down after there. The age discrimination is horrendous. And everybody in that baby boomer age group is experiencing the same thing.”
For 99 weeks, weeks, Paoletti accepted New York state and federal unemployment benefits. This spring, they ran out. Now, she is drawing down her IRA to stay afloat, underwater on her mortgage and without health insurance.
She’s not alone. Indeed, Paoletti is one of a million 99ers, as the long-term unemployed who have exceeded the maximum number of weeks of benefits are known.
The joblessness crisis — in the average duration of unemployment, if not the absolute unemployment rate — is unprecedented in the postwar United States. Of the 15 million unemployed in America, over 7 million have been out of work for more than six months, nearly 5 million for a year and over 1 million for two years — the worst statistics since the government started keeping count in 1948. The proportion of the unemployed out of work for more than six months has doubled in the past year, to more than 46 percent. The jobseekers-to-jobs ratio, which tells how hard positions are to get, remains around 5.6 to 1.
Paoletti and other 99ers are afflicted by a constellation of problems. Many are underwater on their mortgages, meaning they cannot sell their homes and move away. Many are “structurally unemployed,” meaning that demand for their now-obsolete skills will not tick back up as the recession eases. And many have deep ties to their communities, and cannot or will not move for another job. For instance, Paoletti’s father recently passed away after a battle with Alzheimer’s; she helped care for him until his death. Her brother (also unemployed for years now) lives nearby, and her daughter — who moved home when she lost her job, and just found work decorating cakes part-time at a grocery store — lives with her.
The million 99ers like Paoletti do not just struggle with the immediate effects of joblessness — including, in many cases, the slide from the middle class into poverty. They also struggle with the lingering deleterious effects. The longer people are unemployed, the harder it is for them to regain a job. Their skills deteriorate. They tend to lose confidence, become depressed and suffer from higher rates of divorce and suicide.
Paoletti — and many experts — believe that only an expansion of emergency unemployment benefits or a similar intervention from Washington will save her and her cohort from abject poverty if employment does not rebound strongly, quickly. But Washington doesn’t seem motivated to fight for jobs — or for the 99ers. The Senate is currently considering a $100 billion jobs package that might include new money to hire workers for highway repair and to preserve local-government hiring of teachers, as well as tax breaks for employers. But none of the measures under consideration in the bill would keep the benefit checks coming in the mail for more than 99 weeks.
The senators from Paoletti’s home state — Democrats Charles Schumer and Kirsten Gillibrand — have both indicated they might be willing to extend unemployment benefits to 100-plus weeks. (This would create a fifth tier of unemployment benefits. Tier IV, created by Congress last year, brought the maximum number of weeks of benefits to 99 in states with high unemployment rates.) Schumer even wrote a letter that was published on the website of Paoletti’s local newspaper, saying, “Once I ensure that every New Yorker receives the full 99 weeks to which they are entitled, I will work with my colleagues to create a fifth tier of benefits. More than 25,000 New Yorkers have exhausted the full 99 weeks of benefits and I am committed to providing them further relief.”
But the Senate as a whole is less than willing. Sen. Max Baucus (D-Mont.), the chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, has indicated that he will not vote for a fifth tier, as have others. “You can’t go on forever. I think 99 weeks is sufficient,” Baucus told Bloomberg News. Sen. Byron Dorgan (D-N.D.) likewise dismissed the idea. “There’s just been no discussion to go beyond [99 weeks],” he said. And the Senate leadership, without explicitly shooting down a fifth tier, has nodded in agreement.
Paoletti argues that Washington recognizes the enormity and seriousness of the problem but is turning its back on some of the nation’s neediest. The recalcitrance has led her to go activist. She and some friends are currently lobbying for the final passage of the latest extenders bill, known in online communities for the 99ers as “4213,” its original bill number in the House. It would not help people who have exhausted benefits, but would prevent the expiry of Tier IV extended benefits for hundreds of thousands of people a week. Additionally, Paoletti and others meet up on listservs and websites, fax resumes to Washington and call congressional offices.
She hopes that a hearing on Thursday might prove the turning point for the 99ers. Rep. Jim McDermott (D-Wash.), the head of the subpanel on income security and family support for the House Ways and Means Committee, is holding the first hearing on policy responses for long-term unemployment. “Our first step to respond to long-term unemployment is obvious — continue the emergency federal unemployment programs to prevent millions of workers from losing their benefits,” McDermott said in a statement. “If we can afford wars, tax cuts and bank bailouts, then we can certainly afford to maintain programs for workers who have lost their jobs through no fault of their own. An increasing number of Americans who have worked hard and played by the rules are now finding themselves with no job, no savings and no support. We must not abandon these workers and their families.”
Paoletti hopes that the hearing — where letters from her and thousands others might be read into the record — will gin up pressure for Tier V. Other solutions likely to be discussed are job retraining and emergency benefit programs. But it all might be too little, too late for 99ers falling into poverty at a rate of thousands per week.
“Out of all the people [I know] that got laid off the same time as me, I think only three have found jobs,” Paoletti says. “The rest are still all have exhausted unemployment or they’re getting close to the end of it. Someone’s got to do something.”
Wednesday, April 28, 2010
US Unemployed Blogsite: Kirsten Gillibrand Supports Tier 5 Unemployment Extensions
At around 5:15 EST (yesterday) on a live video Facebook session with Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), a number of unemployed persons began voicing their concerns about the need for a Tier 5 Unemployment.
This was the answer from Kirsten Gillibrand:
Please excuse the video quality. It was a record from a ustream Facebook session and may not be the greatest in video quality. The Senator does state that she supports a Tier 5 Unemployment but offers no details as to when the extension may happen.
Please trust, the issue of when was pressed. The collective online participating crowd kept pressuring the Senator for answers of when. Comments from other participants stated replies such as: "the Senator supports the extension, why are you so concerned?" or "you need to ask NY State Legislature about that issue" or my favorite, "Are all of these people being paid to lobby for a Tier 5?"...
No one is getting paid here. It is only the collective efforts of those who can participate in these events raising awareness and asking the questions that so many are desperately seeking the answer. Hopefully, Senator Gillibrand takes this dire need of urgency seriously as HR 4213 is being debated in the coming weeks.




