Showing posts with label wayne barrett. Show all posts
Showing posts with label wayne barrett. Show all posts

Sunday, January 9, 2011

Bloomberg Give Us the Cold Shoulder by Wayne Barrett - NYPOST.com

Read original...

Why does the mayor, so thoughtful in private, have so little empathy?

When my departure from the Village Voice after nearly four decades became news on Tuesday, I got a surprise call at my home office overlooking Windsor Place in Brooklyn from Mike Bloomberg. At first I thought it was a high tech robo-call to an imaginary enemies list.

I had done a phone interview with Chris Matthews just a few days earlier from the same window, detailing every unplowed flake still covering my block. I expected Mayor Mike to blast me as just another outer-borough whiner.
But the “get-over-it” mayor was solicitous. He told me he’d heard about the sudden and involuntary end of my Voice career. He recalled how he remembered the name of everyone who called him the day he was fired at Salomon Brothers, but couldn’t recall anyone’s name that called him when he was elected mayor. It’s the people who call you when you’re down, he said, that really matter. I wanted to remind him that Salomon gave him the $10 million severance that financed the creation of Bloomberg L.P., a sure antidote to despondency, but I kept my tongue.
Bloomberg made it clear a couple of times during the conversation that he didn’t agree with everything I wrote, a gentle understatement. But he added that I would be missed.
What’s odd is that, even when the mayor is doing a caring and intimate thing like his call to me, he sounds uncomfortable and terse. He reminds me of the uncle who arrives at the 6-year-old’s birthday party with the biggest present and the smallest smile.
We have found with the CityTime scandal and the blizzard bungle that Bloomberg has brought less of the corporate management style that made him a billionaire to government than we thought. But he does appear to have transferred to the public sphere the imperiousness of the corporate personality, a resolute and awkward distancing designed to insulate the boss from charges of soft-touch favoritism.
Bloomberg is just so much more able to empathize one-on-one than he is to connect with a suffering mass, unless you consider Wall Street bankers a beleaguered underclass. It’s not just the unplowed that can be dismissed as clatter by our crisp and sometimes contemptuous mayor — he has harrumphed over the complaints of transit riders, pothole pleaders, Con Ed customers without power, and even those who lost their subprime homes to foreclosure.
“You can also blame the people that took out the mortgages,” he said, though later noting how “very sorry” he felt for Dick Fuld and Lehman Brothers, subprime sewer plunderers finally foreclosed on by their own bankers. The polled public, which is apparently now giving him record-low favorability numbers, undoubtedly can’t recall the specifics, but there is a collective subconscious memory about Bloomberg’s double-standard boosterism, which extends beyond bankers to other class heroes. “Last time I checked, the pharmaceutical industry doesn’t make a lot of money, its executives don’t make a lot of money,” was one gem. Cable companies seeking rate hikes: “They don’t make a lot of money.” And when taxpayer-aided bonuses became the hot issue in 2008, it was Bloomberg who declared that city workers, including cops and firefighters, “should be down there demanding, ‘Pay Wall Street people more.’ That’s where their salaries come from.”
Topping them all was the mayor’s Great Recession jewel that “the rich aren’t making any money” either. “We love the rich people” was a Bloombergism that never made it onto the big screen of his endless spool of 2009 re-election commercials, but it does encapsulate the anger people feel now, when his let-them-eat-ice chilliness during the storm left many who aren’t rich feeling very unloved.
It is hard to remember at these moments that this is the same mayor who sat in his office day after day calling the homes of every family that lost a cop or firefighter on September 11 and bleeding with them, even though it occurred months before he took office. This is the man who has quietly financed the legal defense of a dockworker and a horse trainer he believed were falsely accused of a crime, and was vindicated both times by the courts. When my mentor and onetime Post columnist Jack Newfield died in 2004, Bloomberg went to the memorial and stayed for the entire two-hour series of eulogies even though he wasn’t on the speaker list and was denounced by Jimmy Breslin from the pulpit for his supposed complicity in the Iraq War.
We seldom see this grace at his Blue Room press conferences, where he is more likely to carry a chip on his shoulder than let anyone cry on it.
I was at Bloomberg’s victory party at the Sheraton last year, one of a hundred political celebrations I’ve covered. It was the oddest. He came out on the stage alone. He saluted the women in his life, though none were standing beside him. The coalition that had just re-elected him was invisible. As was the administration he led. Behind him on a platform were multi-racial layers of anonymous and paid extras to lead the cheers. The ballroom itself was packed with the best-dressed assemblage of young professionals with free booze in their hands I’d ever seen at a victory gala, barely listening to his speech. The theme song might as well have been “Can’t Buy Me Love.”
Our other recent three-term mayor, Ed Koch, was a loner, too, in some ways. But he had an electric connection to people. If they keep a television camera in the operating room, he will never die. New Yorkers would willingly trade charisma for efficiency but we’ve discovered in recent days that we’re getting neither.
In a recent “Meet the Press” appearance, Bloomberg closed the door on a presidential campaign and said he just wanted to be the greatest mayor in the history of the city. Putting a GPS device on sanitation trucks for the next snowstorm won’t make him that. With three years to go, Mike Bloomberg has to open his heart to us, climb out of his cautious and caustic bag, and share himself with his city.
We don’t just miss him when he’s in Bermuda. We miss him, as strange as it sounds, when he is here.
Wayne Barrett, longtime Village Voice columnist, is now a fellow at the Nation Institute.

Friday, January 7, 2011

Wayne Barrett and Tom Robbins Leave Village Voice by Jeremy W. Peters - NYTimes.com

Read original...

Wayne Barrett, 65, who had written for The Village Voice since 1973, said he was laid off from The Voice because his six-figure salary was too expensive for the paper. His last day was Dec. 31.
What becomes of New York’s most formidable muckraking paper when two of its greatest muckrakers are gone?


The Village Voice, the granddaddy of alternative weeklies, which enlivened political and investigative journalism in New York through its scrappy, hold-nothing-sacred approach, has lost Wayne Barrett and Tom Robbins, two journalists who helped define the paper’s modern era.
Mr. Barrett’s departure was a sign of the financial strain facing The Voice and print media: he said he was let go because he was too expensive to keep on staff. Mr. Robbins’s exit showed how unpalatable the professional choices facing journalists today can be: he said he would quit the paper at the end of January in a show of solidarity with Mr. Barrett, despite having no other job lined up.
The Voice without either man, some prominent New Yorkers said, is difficult to imagine. And their leaving raises questions about what kind of future the paper has in the city whose politics it fermented and culture it shaped.
“With the loss of Wayne and Tom, they lost Joe DiMaggio and Mickey Mantle,” said Don Forst, who was editor of The Voice from 1996 to 2005 and edited the work of both men
Mr. Forst said their departures left the paper, which had already been downsized considerably in the last decade, greatly diminished. “It was a great institution for what it was,” he said. “It was not The Times. It wasn’t The Post. It was The Village Voice. And I think it was the role model for all folk alternative papers. I don’t know what they have left.”
Mr. Barrett has written for The Voice since 1973, was earning a six-figure salary and had minimal expenses and an unpaid staff of interns. He announced his departure in a column published on the paper’s Web site on Tuesday morning. His last day was Dec. 31.
“I have written, by my own inexact calculation, more column inches than anyone in the history of The Voice. These will be my last,” he wrote. “I am 65 and a half now, and it is time for something new.” He will become a fellow at The Nation Institute, a liberal nonprofit media group.
Mr. Robbins, in an interview, said he could not bear the thought of staying on at The Voice without Mr. Barrett. “I think he’s a big loss for the paper, which is why I decided I thought I would move on as well,” Mr. Robbins said. “And I wish the paper well.”
Tom Robbins, who, like Mr. Barrett, was known for his energetic exposes of corruption, said he would quit The Voice at the end of January in a show of solidarity with Mr. Barrett.
Tony Ortega, the editor of The Voice, said it was painful to see both reporters leave. But he insisted there was no lingering animosity on anyone’s part.
“It is what it is,” a subdued Mr. Ortega said in an interview, adding that the financial pressures on the paper had forced him into a difficult position. “By now I think we expected the economy to be doing a little better. So I’m a little disappointed we haven’t grown. But we’re holding our own.”
The paper was in trouble before New Times Media, a national chain of alternative weeklies, merged with it in 2006, and it has been reduced considerably since then. Mr. Ortega said he had to cut about a half-dozen positions when the economy collapsed in 2008 — a small number but one that made a significant dent in a newsroom that now has only about 25 people.
Tumult in the editor’s chair has been just as disruptive. When Mr. Ortega, the former editor of The Broward-Palm Beach New Times, took over in 2007, he became The Voice’s fifth editor in little more than a year.
But through it all, Mr. Barrett and Mr. Robbins were fixtures — not only of their storied newspaper but also of the New York City press corps. Mr. Robbins, who first worked at The Voice in the mid-1980s, then departed for The Daily News and returned in 2000, is known for an encyclopedic knowledge of city politics and a big heart (he donated one of his kidneys to a friend). He earned a reputation as an equal opportunity exposer of corruption, regardless of political affiliation.
Mr. Barrett was also known for his digging. He was the first to uncover that Rudolph W. Giuliani’s father had gone to prison for robbing a milkman at gunpoint, and was once barred from interviewing former Mayor Edward I. Koch, the subject of a book Mr. Barrett co-wrote with Jack Newfield. It was titled — unflatteringly for Mr. Koch — “City for Sale: Ed Koch and the Betrayal of New York.”
Mr. Koch, asked to reflect on Mr. Barrett’s work on Tuesday, said, “In terms of the quality of his reportage: superb.”
Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg was characteristically less effusive. “I can’t say we’ve always agreed, but Wayne’s voice will be missed,” the mayor said.
Despite losing both men, Mr. Ortega said his staff was highly capable and well equipped to carry on the paper’s proud tradition. Mr. Robbins will eventually be replaced, but Mr. Barrett will not. “People are just going to soldier on and do their stuff,” Mr. Ortega said.