Showing posts with label global warming. Show all posts
Showing posts with label global warming. Show all posts

Monday, December 28, 2009

Free Electronics Recycling Event at District Office of NYS Senator Joseph P. Addabbo, Jr., on Saturday, January 9, 2010..

Click on image to enlarge...


WHO: New York State Senator Joe Addabbo, Jr., is sponsoring a free, post-holiday recycling event at his district office, in collaboration with representatives from e-Green Management, LLC. Recycle your unwanted electronic equipment; two trucks will be available to collect your old, outdated items to make room for new equipment.

WHAT: E-Waste Collection Event – FREE!

Participate in an environmentally responsible free event that will prevent your electronic waste from entering into a landfill and polluting our environment. e-Green promotes “zero waste to landfill” ethics and operates “cradle to cradle” under all Federal, State and local regulations to ensure the responsible recycling of all e-waste collected. e-Green will recycle your unwanted electronic equipment, including: computers, fax machines, scanners, laptops, monitors, typewriters, copiers, cameras, cell phones, televisions, printers, telephones, servers, PDAs, batteries.

WHERE: Senator Joe Addabbo, Jr. - District Office, 159-53 102nd Street, Howard Beach, New York 11414

WHEN: Saturday, January 9, 2010, 10 AM – 3 PM

Once the equipment is accepted here, the following process takes place: all hazardous components (batteries on circuit boards and portable equipment, mercury switches, toxic capacitors, fluorescent lamps, leaded glass from monitors, etc.) will be extracted prior to destruction. These are then disposed of in an environmentally sound manner, exceeding Federal and State regulations. Non-hazardous materials (paper, plastic, metal, glass, etc.) are recycled. All material assigned to destruction is totally disassembled, shredded, incinerated or a combination of these.

For more information about this event or e-waste recycling, please contact Senator Addabbo’s district office at 718-738-1111.


Thursday, October 22, 2009

The NYC Premier of "Sizzle - A Global Warming Comedy" at The New School Tomorrow Nite 7:00 pm...

Attend the FREE NYC Premiere of "Sizzle - A Global Warming Comedy" at The New School Tishman Auditorium - 66 West 12th Street - Greenwich Village, New York City on October 23rd - 7:00 pm...

Wednesday, July 8, 2009

Greenpeace Challenges President Obama to Stop Global Warming with an Event at Mount Rushmore

Three Greenpeace climbers hang a banner on the face of Mount Rushmore to issue a challenge to President Obama: "America honors leaders, not politicians: Stop global warming."

The action is part of a global day of action staged by Greenpeace to urge world leaders, who are currently attending a G8 meeting in Laquila, Italy, to take the actions necessary to avert runaway climate change.

Monday, October 13, 2008

State Explores Wind Energy Off the Rockaway Peninsula by Lee Landor - Queens Chronicle

Read original...

Crisis is a word the public hears several times a day, every day. “Financial crisis,” “health care crisis,” “climate change crisis,” “energy crisis” — these phrases are seen, heard and read everywhere from the evening news to the morning radio broadcast to the lunch-break newspaper.

Some find it refreshing to finally read about “potential,” and were glad to hear about the launch of a project exploring possible wind energy for New York State.

An interdisciplinary working group formed last month between the Long Island Power Authority and Consolidated Edison to study the potential for an offshore wind project that would be situated at least 10 miles off the Rockaway Peninsula.

This marks the first regional partnership project between LIPA and ConEd.

The project originated from a series of recommendations made in February 2007 by the Governor’s Renewable Energy Taskforce — a commission charged with a series of tasks aimed at increasing the state’s supply of clean, renewable energy.

Those included identifying barriers to increased production of renewable energy; recommending policies and financial incentives to overcome those barriers; and identifying future markers where additional research and development investment is necessary.

The wind energy project was among the recommendations made in a report released by the task force in February 2007.

It suggested the formation of a working group that would study suitable locations for an offshore wind project; transmission and interconnection capabilities; and the availability of wind as an energy source.

Information gathered from this study will be used to determine whether there are opportunities for such a project and its feasibility. If a wind energy project is feasible, the working group would develop a request for proposals whereby both utilities could share the cost of and power generated by the project.

Wind developers, industry representatives and other interested parties will be invited to participate in the study, as well.

The project could provide a variety of benefits, according to Gov. David Paterson. It could stimulate investments in clean and renewable energy technologies, which would create more clean-technology, or “green collar” jobs, incite significant market developments for the wind industry and help diversify the state’s electricity system.

This is not LIPA’s first attempt to create offshore wind turbine farms that harness the clean, renewable energy. Several years ago it proposed the construction of a 40-turbine wind farm off Jones Beach that would have produced 140 megawatts of energy. LIPA shelved the project when it discovered that costs substantially exceeded what was originally anticipated.

New offshore wind turbine technologies that allow facilities to be sited much further offshore now than was possible just a few years ago prompted LIPA to give the idea a second attempt.

“I share the ... desire to introduce more wind resources in the metropolitan region,” said LIPA President and CEO Kevin Law in a statement. “While there is plenty of windpower upstate, there is a transmission bottleneck that makes it difficult to get it to New York City and Long Island, and we need to do some planning to see if offshore wind makes sense downstate.”

ConEd’s Chairman and CEO, Kevin Burke, called the use of renewable technologies “critical” to the economy. “This burgeoning market has potential as limitless as the energy it can generate,” he said.

Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who is known to be environmentally conscious and who has taken efforts to improve the city’s energy efficiency, welcomed this effort to building a “greener, greater New York.”

Don Riepe, president of the Northeast Chapter of the American Littoral Society and founder of the Jamaica Bay Guardian, agreed that, overall, the project is a step in the right direction. But, he said, “we need to look at it from a wholistic approach.”

Part of the energy-efficiency package should be conservation. “Nobody talks about ... using less energy so we don’t have to keep plugging in more and more things into the system,” Riepe noted.

What about solar energy and green roofs, he asked. “There’s lots we can do and I think all of that should be part of the mix, not just say, ‘Oh, we need more energy, let’s put a whole bunch of windmills out there,’ like that’s going to solve it.”

Riepe’s most important piece of advice to the task force and the public was: “You have to weigh the environmental benefits as well as the costs.”

©Queens Chronicle 2008

Wednesday, October 8, 2008

Green (NYLCV) Endorsements by Irene Jay Liu - New York Politics Capitol Confidential - Albany Times Union - timesunion.com

Read original...
The New York League of Conservation Voters has announced their “green” slate of candidates for the general election.

In the race for the Senate, the League endorsed mostly incumbent Democrats and Democratic challengers.

The Democratic challengers include:

  • Joseph Addabbo, who is running against Sen. Serph Maltese
  • Don Barber, who is running against Sen. James Seward
  • Lawrence Delarose, who is running against Sen. Bill Larkin
  • Brian Foley, running against Sen. Caesar Trunzo

They are also taking an interesting tack in certain races, endorsing opposing candidates.

  • Challenger Liz Feld and Sen. Suzi Oppenheimer
  • Challenger James Gennaro and Sen. Frank Padavan

We felt both candidates has impressive track records in their own rights…we rarely do that, but people want to have clarity one or the other, but we wanted to let people know that you can’t go wrong with either candidate. These four candidates have really proven themselves over the years. Either choice is going to be a good one for the environment,” said NYLCV spokesman Dan Hendrick.


See the full list of endorsements and press release after the jump.

For additional information contact:

Dan Hendrick, (212) 361-6350, ext. 206

Cell (917) 207-8715


Thursday, March 6, 2008

Worksman Cycles - Oldest Bike Manufacturer in the U.S. Goes Solar - Solar One...

Read original...


Last week, The New York Industrial Retention Network(NYIRN) in partnership with Solar Energy Systems (SES) announced the installation of a 15.12 kilowatt Photovoltaic (PV) system at the factory of Worksman Cycles, the oldest bicycle manufacturer in the U.S., located in Ozone Park in Queens, New York.

Through NYIRN’s RenewableNY program, Worksman Cycles met Brooklyn-based SES, a solar energy integrator speciallizing in commercial applications. SES designed and installed the system on the facility’s rooftop. It will generate more than 600,000 kilowatt-hours over its 40-year expected lifetime. Combining this production with NYC electrical cost savings programs will reduce Workman’s monthly electric bill by over 20 percent. The solar output will protect Worksman against future rate increases and lessen the burden on New York’s electricity grid.

“Because solar energy production peaks in conjunction with high usage, New York City benefits by further alleviating the need for peaking generators, which typically are the most polluting of all generation sources,” said David Buckner, President of SES.

However, one striking aspect of the 1700 sq ft system is that it is surrounded by 15,000 sq ft of empty roof space. Were it not for the restrictive net-metering policies of New York State, a much larger system might have been installed. Net-metering is the arrangement by which solar owners are able sell back excess electricity to the grid that is produced by their systems when solar production exceeds building consumption. This policy helps reduce the time it takes to pay back the initial cost of a solar system, and is widely recognized as being essential to building a viable solar market. New York State’s net-metering laws currently only allow small residential systems (10kW or smaller) to net-meter.

Not only is a system owner like Workman Cycles unable to currently net-meter, if it were to install a larger system that might at any point produce more electricity than is consumed by the building, it would be required to install an expensive piece of hardware called a reverse power relay that restricts solar electricity from entering the grid. The equipment can cost between $10,000 and $40,000. The result: in the absence of wider net-metering laws, there is a major financial disincentive for installing large solar systems in New York.

This spring, the New York State Legislature will likely vote on a new net-metering bill that would expand the law to include non-residential buildings while also dramatically raising the cap on the allowable size of systems. This would enable rooftops like Workman Cycle’s to add bigger solar systems.

Therefore take action: call your State Senator and Assembly Member today and urge them to support expanded net-metering!

Saturday, December 29, 2007

The Binocular Brigade - New York Times

Read original...


PATH that skirts the Lake Tappan Reservoir in River Vale was silent but for calls from a flotilla of Canada geese and a team of birdwatchers’ footfalls as they cracked the runner of ice-encrusted snow.

Suddenly, a voice broke the chill morning hush.

“Shrike!” announced Kenneth Witkowski of Hardyston, the team leader. His fellow birders swarmed around his tripod-perched spotting scope, sharing the moment.

The predatory shrike, also known as the “butcher bird,” along with a bounty of about a dozen adult and immature American bald eagles, hundreds of svelte merganser ducks, a lone robin, and a few herons were among the many birds spotted that Saturday morning in Bergen County.

While the group of five recorded their sightings, other birders throughout the nation were doing the same as part of the National Audubon Society’s 108th annual Christmas bird count. The count was established on Dec. 25, 1900, by Frank M. Chapman, a curator of ornithology at the American Museum of Natural History. His intent was to track and tally the birds, not hunt them. Twenty-five counters were dispatched to 27 locations across the United States, including parts of Englewood, Moorestown and Newfield. Those original observers counted a total of 90 species.

Today, there are 11 Audubon chapters in Connecticut, 5 in New Jersey, 5 in Westchester County and 7 on Long Island. The bird count turnout varies from place to place, from a team of two in Peekskill, N.Y., to 60 in Orient, on Long Island.

Some observers take part in multiple counts. Counters, totaling a record 57,851 last winter, include field observers and birders counting at home feeders. Local numbers contribute to Audubon’s yearly totals for the United States, Canada, Latin America, the Caribbean and American protectorates in the South Pacific.

Each chapter selects a single day between Dec. 14 and Jan. 5 to stage its event. The count area is a circle with a 15-mile diameter through a given point. Each birder sets his or her sight on a part of the circle, counts the type of bird flying though and reports it to the group leader. Participants make every effort not to count the same bird twice, and the leader’s separate tally usually serves as a control.

At Lake Tappan Reservoir, Mr. Witkowski forged ahead, identifying species and conducting his own independent count as he moved along. He was followed by team members who, as backup, lingered behind to count larger groups of birds.

Natural features around the tristate region cut a wide swath — fields, farmlands, deciduous forests, wetlands, shorelines and waters — sustaining some 450 species of bird life. Among the species sighted are owls, including the screech and saw-whet, a range of warblers, the ubiquitous Canada geese, peregrine falcons and bald eagles. The latter two species are no longer on the federal endangered species list, a significant victory in Audubon’s view.

But many avid birders are just as happy spotting a humble starling as a rare snowy owl. “I try to get out as often as possible, not always searching for that mega-rarity — the bird that comes from Asia — but just to enjoy the search,” said Steven Biasetti, with the Eastern Long Island Audubon Society in East Quogue.

And the company’s not bad, either. “We have a good time, that’s for sure,” Mr. Biasetti said. “It’s great camaraderie.”

Others value the quiet intimacy between human and bird. “For me, nature is art,” said Mary Normandia of Glen Cove, N.Y. “The colors of the birds, even the decaying matter, the smells. All the great artists, musicians, poets have taken their cues from nature.” Ms. Normandia cites “The Art of Seeing Things” (Syracuse University Press, 2001), by the naturalist John Burrroughs, as a foundation for bird appreciation. Quoting Burroughs, she said, “You must have a bird in the heart before you can find one in the bush.”

A good pair of binoculars also helps. “Field optics are a requirement,” said Rik Kaufman, a birdwatcher with the Saw Mill River Audubon in Chappaqua, N.Y. He suggested “getting a nominal 8X40-sized binocular of the best quality you can afford.” Prices range from $100 to $1,000.

Mr. Kaufman and others also recommended a good guidebook. Roger Tory Peterson, who for a time led counts in southern Westchester, produced the compact 1932 standard “Field Guide to the Birds” (Knopf). An alternative is David Allen Sibley’s “The Sibley Guide to Birds” (Houghton Mifflin, 2000), which may appeal to more sophisticated birdwatchers.

“Birds lend an identity to an area,” said Mike Cooper, who is affiliated with the Great South Audubon Society, in Sayville, N.Y. And that identity, for better or worse, is reflected back in bird behavior and patterns.

John Flicker, president of the National Audubon Society, has called birds “the canary in the coal mine — a sign that something is going on” in terms of environmental change.

National Audubon recently issued its WatchList 2007, a periodic synthesis of data for the United States that takes into account current species’ population size, population trends, range size of a species and threats to a spread of populations. According to Dr. Greg Butcher, National Audubon’s director of bird conservation, there are 10 regional species on the WatchList’s urgent list and some 37 regional species on the cautionary list.

“The worst of it is definitely in the future,” Dr. Butcher said. Among other things, “we’re worried about the coastal species in 50 to 100 years.”

Geoffrey S. LeBaron, national director of the bird count, elaborated. Should ocean levels rise in coming decades, he said, the already endangered piping plover that nests on Jones Beach and elsewhere, for one, would be particularly vulnerable.

Mr. LeBaron calls forest species the future’s “wild card.” Common, adaptable species with habitats near the human population will probably be relatively unaffected, he said.

For now, there is unease, if not panic, among the New York region’s birders.

Julian Sproule, president of the Saugatuck Valley Audubon Society, in Wilton, Conn., also serves on birding boards at the state level and has a broader perspective on how climate change affects the region. He points to a study led by Alan Hitch, a wildlife expert at Auburn University, that clearly documents a northward trend among certain species. The familiar northern cardinal, Mr. Sproule said, and the Carolina wren are wintering here.

Scott Heth, president of the Sharon Audubon Society in Connecticut, said, “We’re pretty sure that has to do with climate change.” Green herons are atypically wintering in Orient. Mockingbirds, Baltimore orioles, egrets and some hummingbirds are wintering around New York.

Moreover, some birdwatchers lament the loss of habitat throughout the area. It is considered “at least as important as climate change” to species depletion, said Lawrence Trachtenberg, who watches from Westchester.

Dr. Butcher said that habitat loss, caused by “the tremendous growth of the megalopolis” around New York, has already caused the demise of the northern bobwhite, and “has had a pretty dramatic effect” on kestrel populations as well as other species here.

Audubon suggests that citizen action may help forestall the trend. The federal farm bill under consideration would call for wetlands and grasslands protection. It also includes the Conservation Reserve Program, which would encourage private landowners to set aside habitat land. Audubon welcomes grass-roots support for such legislative initiatives, and the Christmas bird count, society administrators say, can serve as a rallying point for this kind of organized advocacy. They also suggest remedies on the home front, like nurturing native backyard plants to create new bird habitats, but are concerned that a new generation of nature stewards is being lost to the lure of the indoor screen.

Susan Krause, president of the Four Harbors Audubon Society in St. James, N.Y., teaches at the Sweetbriar Nature Center in Smithtown. She recommends “Last Child in the Woods: Saving Our Children From Nature-Deficit Disorder,” by Richard Louv (Algonquin Books, 2005).

Mr. Louv is a key member of the Children and Nature Movement, a national effort to address what many see as a spreading disconnect between young people and the great outdoors.

AS a localized solution, Fran Zygmont, president of the Litchfield Hills Audubon Society in Connecticut, reports that his chapter has teamed up with Litchfield classrooms, reaching 2,000 students, to promote birding.

And Alison Guinness, president of the Mattabeseck Audubon Society, in Middletown, Conn., said her chapter had founded a feeder program in local schools in memory of David Titus, one of the region’s pre-eminent birdwatchers.

Mr. Titus, a Japanese scholar who did extensive birdwatching in that nation and inspired a generation of birders in the United States, once called the Christmas bird count “our annual frostbite fellowship.”

Ms. Guinness could not agree more. When asked the secret to skilled birdwatching, she did not hesitate to answer: “Perseverance and lots of warm clothes.”

With a mid-December northeaster on its way, it was pretty frosty as the Lake Tappan team trekked around the reservoir.

“We’re going into the wind now, so buck up!” Mr. Witkowski urged as the group neared an exposed elbow of land. All braced for an abrupt, cold shock.

“Birdwatchers are friendly, willing to share the sport,” Linda Peskac of Park Ridge shouted against the wind. “And it is a sport.”

In the background, a majestic bald eagle sallied from sky to water, effortlessly snatching a fish in its talons.

“Ah, what a day!” Mr. Witkowski observed with a contagious satisfaction.

Searching for Green in Gotham - NYS Dept. of Environmental Conservation

Read original....


New York City is my laboratory. When spring peepers begin chorusing in March, I am transformed from sleepy bookworm into mad scientist, keen to identify every plant and animal I find in my travels through Gotham. On starry summer nights, I creep through Central Park, in search of owls that flit from tree to tree in the shadow of skyscrapers. In autumn, I spend hours with my neck craned to the skyline, watching hawks heading south in migration. During winter, I keep warm in science libraries, thumbing through vivid accounts of wild New York written by early naturalists in whose footsteps I now follow. I am on a mission to determine what plants and animals inhabited my city in the past, and which ones live here still. Why have some species disappeared, while others flourished? Is there any rhyme or reason to these local extinctions? By answering such questions, it might be possible to develop strategies to protect our remaining biodiversity.

I know, I know. To some, New York City is regarded as the land of rats, roaches and other nasty things. Worse, many scientists don't take urban ecology studies seriously. I am often teased by those who do "serious" research in the rainforests of faraway Shangri-las. Compared to them, I feel like an outsider to real science. However, important biological information that has relevance to "wild" places can be discovered in urban areas if you know where to look. Cities like New York afford wonderful opportunities to study changes in biodiversity through time. There is often a history of investigation for particular urban locations made by naturalists dating back as far as the early 19th century, recorded in scientific papers, museum specimens and field notes. This historical record can then be compared to what still exists today in order to understand how and why changes have occurred.

Does the study of New York City's urban ecology have any relevance to other places? Absolutely. Today, most people in North America, South America, Europe and Australia live in cities. By 2025, almost two-thirds of the world's people will live in urban areas. Understanding the effects of rapid development will help conservation biologists decide what kinds of species and habitats to monitor in the coming years as urban sprawl affects natural areas throughout the world. Rather than a strange place to study nature, New York City might be the perfect laboratory to study a habitat that people, plants and wildlife share together. Understanding changes in diversity in New York City through time can shed light on the future of biodiversity everywhere.

Here in Gotham, my favorite species are wildflowers and other plants that grow in our parks. No special skills are needed to find them, and they won't run or fly away when you do. Plants define natural areas in the five boroughs: from the meadows and woodlands of the Bronx to the ponds and forests of Staten Island, to the sandy ocean beaches and salt marshes of Brooklyn and Queens-and even to the baseball fields of Manhattan's Central Park. Native plants (those found here before Europeans arrived) tell us about what New York City was like in the past and our connection to other places near and far. For example, a native tree such as the sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua) commonly grows in moist woodlands in all five boroughs and ranges south to Guatemala. Another native species found here, skunk cabbage (Symplocarpus foetidus), is also native to eastern China. American chestnut (Castanea dentata) trees still exist in New York City and so do native orchids. We have at least one globally endangered plant, Torrey's mountain mint (Pycnanthemum torrei), found in fewer than 20 other locations in North America.

New York City also has many non-native plants such as dandelions, hawkweeds and bittersweet. To the casual observer, these invasive plants make natural areas in New York City look vibrant. But looks can be deceiving. These non-native plants tell a tale of disturbance and development, extinction and invasion.

Non-native plants such as purple loosestrife, Asiatic dayflower, garlic mustard and porcelainberry can outcompete native plants creating a landscape of sameness that can adversely affect birds and insects.

Some of these non-native European species are so aggressive they can sprout through the asphalt in parking lots. Alien plants such as porcelainberry (Ampelopsis brevipedunculata), mugwort (Artemisia vulgaris) and Asiatic dayflower (Commelina communis) have run rampant in meadows throughout the city, making it virtually impossible for native species to keep a toe-hold. We have little idea how others such as purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) affect the diversity of our native insects and birds. Overall, in the last 50 years many of our natural areas have become dominated by a handful of nonnative generalist species, creating a landscape of sameness.

As a result, we are losing the diversity that is characteristic of New York City. In order to help combat this invasion and preserve native plant species, we urban scientists needed some weapons of our own: an inventory of what plants once lived here but are now gone (extirpated), and a comprehensive list of what remains (extant). In the past two decades, my colleagues and I have compiled a list of more than 2,100 New York City plant species, 1,369 (65%) native plants and 739 (35%) non-native. New York City is home to about 60% of the native species ever recorded in New York State-an area 150 times larger. Pockets of native plants still thrive in New York City because some of the finest natural areas were set aside as parkland beginning in the mid 19th century, including Central Park in Manhattan and Prospect Park in Brooklyn. Most of the Bronx parks were established in 1888 as part of New York City's first environmental movement, whose motto was "More Parks Now!" By the late 19th century, clubs and organizations with strong interests in plants and wildlife had been established. These included the Torrey Botanical Club (1867), the American Museum of Natural History (1869), the Linnaean Society of New York (1878), the Staten Island Institute of Arts and Sciences (1881), the New York Botanical Garden (1891) and the Wildlife Conservation Society (1895). Today, we have a good idea of what plants and animals were previously found in each borough because of the collections, notes and writings made by members of these organizations.

Since the first comprehensive studies began, native herbaceous plants such as wildflowers, sedges and grasses have been most abundant. Approximately 30% of our botanical diversity comes from just three families of plants whose members generally prefer much sunshine. These include asters and goldenrod species (Asteraceae), grasses (Poaceae), and sedges (Cyperaceae). The abundance of species in these and similar sunloving plant families indicates that from the 19th to mid 20th century, most of New York City's natural areas were composed of open fields and meadows. Closed canopy forests were rare. Since the Second World War, we have lost nearly half of our native herbaceous species. By comparison, only about a fifth of woody shrubs and trees have become extinct in New York City. Certain groups of our native plants have been particularly prone to extinction. Gone are the majority of our native ferns, violets, sedges, grasses, and pondweeds. We have lost 24 of the 30 species of native orchids ever found here. All 21 of the native orchids once found on Manhattan Island have been eliminated. Nine entire plant families (all composed of herbaceous species) have been extirpated from New York City. Sadly, here in the Big Apple, native herbaceous plants, especially wildflowers, appear to have a dim future for a variety of reasons.

Pockets of native plants still thrive in New York City because of its magnificent parks. Half of all the plants ever catalogued in New York State, are found in the city.

In our parks in the last 75 years, development for landfills, highway expansion, baseball fields, buildings and water treatment facilities has caused a net loss of open space for living things. Native herbaceous plants are forced to exist on ever smaller parcels of land. Many sun-loving native plant species are being shaded out as the forest around them has matured. In the few remaining meadows and fields, our native species are losing the war of competition with aggressive non-native plants.

Increased use of city parks has had a negative effect too, especially on erodible slopes and sensitive wetlands. Perhaps the most important lesson to be learned from New York City is that the designation of an area as a park is not sufficient to ensure the preservation of its native plants, or to prevent the invasion of nonnative species. This is most evident in Pelham Bay Park in the Bronx, the second largest park in New York City. Since 1947, at least 145 native plant species have been extirpated, while 136 non-native species became established during this same time frame. Every habitat in that park has a greater percentage of non-native species than just a half-century ago.

In each New York City borough, a wave of extinction threatens our native flora. Not surprisingly, Manhattan and Brooklyn, the two boroughs that developed the fastest in the 19th century, have been affected most. They have the least amount of parkland and have lost approximately 70% of their native species. Even Queens, where most parks were established from the 1920s through the 1960s, lost roughly 62% of its native flora. An alarming trend is clearly evident: in every borough except Staten Island, more native species have been eliminated than still exist. If other boroughs are any indication, the same trend is going to happen to native plant species diversity on Staten Island in the coming years.

Being a true-blue scientist with ear pressed to the ground, I am always listening for solid ideas to help save New York City's remaining plant diversity and prevent further degradation of our natural areas.

Perhaps collecting seeds of native plants for propagation and translocation, or removing acres of non-native plants that carpet our parks could stop the loss of native species. Such endeavors are part of the solution, but we can't forget to preserve one of our most important habitats: the classroom. Growing there now are young New Yorkers in whose eyes I can read two fundamental questions: Why should we care if our native species go extinct? Why is preserving our diversity important?

These are good questions, and ones that people throughout the world are trying to answer. In the last decade, urban naturalists from as far as Italy and Russia have documented the remaining plant species of their cities, found rare native plants and published scientific papers about changes in local biodiversity. Closer to home, the "Chicago Wilderness" movement has sparked public support and fueled a wave of enthusiasm to save or restore pockets of native plants and animals in the urban environment. In more than one California city, people are working to transform abandoned landfills into meadows, wetlands and forests. Perhaps a new perspective is needed, too: besides restoring parks at street level, green space can be created for native species atop buildings, especially in industrial areas. In New York City, just such an idea is taking root. Almost 600 acres of warehouse roofs are being planted with hardy, drought-resistant grasses and wildflowers for climate control. These and similar solutions, especially if they involve young people, are music to my ears.

Right now in New York City, a renewed environmental movement is afoot to preserve our remaining wild plants and places. Naturalist foot soldiers are combing our parks, continuing to note species new to the city. Graduate students from city universities are conducting ecological studies of urban oases. Reporters from the Village Voice and even the New York Times are reminding everyone that good things can still be found in our town. However, the future of New York City's remaining biodiversity depends on more than the efforts of naturalists, scientists and concerned citizens. We need to ignite the imagination of all New Yorkers, from school kids to taxi drivers to the Mayor.

Who cares about the 2,100 plant species that compose New York's parks, yards and city streets? Why is biodiversity important? I don't know, but I can hear the flowers thinking.

Urban ecologist Dr. Robert DeCandido was born and raised in the Bronx. He has studied bird migration, night hunting peregrine falcons, Gotham's nesting owls and American kestrels, and flora of the Big Apple.

Photo: Robert DeCandido

Thursday, December 13, 2007

The Story of Stuff with Annie Leonard

Watch the complete video...

What is the Story of Stuff?

From its extraction through sale, use and disposal, all the stuff in our lives affects communities at home and abroad, yet most of this is hidden from view. The Story of Stuff is a 20-minute, fast-paced, fact-filled look at the underside of our production and consumption patterns. The Story of Stuff exposes the connections between a huge number of environmental and social issues, and calls us together to create a more sustainable and just world. It'll teach you something, it'll make you laugh, and it just may change the way you look at all the stuff in your life forever.

YouTube clip 2 min 37 secs

The Story of Stuff (http://www.storyofstuff.com) will take you on a provocative tour of our consumer-driven culture — from resource extraction to iPod incineration — exposing the real costs of our use-it and lose-it approach to stuff.


Watch the complete video...

Tuesday, December 4, 2007

NY Times - A Rising Number of Birds at Risk by Anthony DePalma

Read original...

View Audubon 2007 Watchlist...

Relentless sprawl, invasive species and global warming are threatening an increasing number of bird species in the United States, pushing a quarter of them — including dozens in New York and New Jersey — toward extinction, according to a new study by the National Audubon Society and the American Bird Conservancy.


Tony Cenicola/The New York Times

The wood thrush is among the 178 species on the National Audubon Society’s list of threatened birds. Acid rain and sprawl have damaged its habitat and made its numbers plunge.

The study, called WatchList 2007, categorized 178 species in the United States as being threatened, an increase of about 10 percent from 2002, when Audubon’s last study was conducted. Of the 178 species on the list, about 45 spend at least part of the year in this region.

Among the most threatened is the rare Bicknell’s thrush, a native of the Catskill and Adirondack highlands whose winter habitat in the Caribbean is disappearing. Although less at risk, the wood thrush — whose distinctive song was once emblematic of the Northeast’s rugged woodlands — is on the list because a combination of acid rain and sprawl has damaged its habitat and caused its numbers to decline precipitously over the last four decades.

The Audubon list, which was released Wednesday, overlaps the federal government’s official endangered species list in some cases. But it also includes a number of bird species that are not recognized as endangered by the federal government but that biologists fear are in danger of becoming extinct.

“We’re concerned that there’s been almost a moratorium on the listing of endangered birds over the last seven years under this administration,” Greg Butcher, Audubon’s bird conservation director and a co-author of the new study, said in a telephone interview. Placing a threatened bird on the new watch list can bring it the kind of attention it needs to survive even if the federal government does not act, he said.

“When we pay attention to these birds and do the things we know need to be done, these birds recover,” Mr. Butcher said. “All these birds have a chance to rebound if we put the right actions in motion.”

Those actions include channeling new development to established areas, being vigilant about new invasive species that can devastate habitats and limiting carbon dioxide emissions, which contribute to climate change.

The national watch list is divided into two categories: 59 species, including the whooping crane and the lesser prairie-chicken, are on the “red list” for species that are declining rapidly and facing major threats; 119 are on the “yellow list” for species that are declining or rare but are not yet endangered.

In New York, 10 birds — including the Henslow’s sparrow — are on the red list. The cerulean warbler, the short-eared owl and 35 other birds are on the yellow list. New Jersey’s list includes many of the same birds as New York’s. The count in Connecticut is similar, Mr. Butcher said.

The region’s coastal location raises issues of particular concern. Mr. Butcher said he was especially worried about beach birds like the piping plover, the least tern and the black skimmer, as well as birds whose habitat is the region’s disappearing salt marshes. They include the saltmarsh sharp-tailed sparrow and the clapper rail. And he noted that migratory shore birds, including the red knot and the semipalmated sandpiper, would face increasing difficulties in this region.

“As sea level rises, and the salt marshes disappear, these species don’t have anyplace to go,” Mr. Butcher said. “In New York and New Jersey, so many people live close to the coast that we do what we can to safeguard people but we don’t necessarily protect the natural habitat.”

Tuesday, November 6, 2007

NY Daily News - Queens Politicians Urge Protection of Wetlands by John Lauinger...

Queens politicians urge protection of wetlands


Councilman James Gennaro (l.) & Robert Pirani discuss ideas.

With swamps and marshland gradually disappearing across the five boroughs, two Council members are calling on City Hall to preserve more than 250 acres of city-owned wetlands.

Queens Councilmen James Gennaro and Joseph Addabbo urged Mayor Bloomberg to place the land − 82 properties in all, including 68 in Queens − under Parks Department jurisdiction.

The holdings are currently controlled by as many as 12 different city agencies. With darker financial clouds looming for city government, the Council members reasoned, the time is now to pull those neglected environmental assets under the Parks Department umbrella.

"In the last century, the New York harbor area has lost about 86 square miles of coastal wetlands," Gennaro (D-Fresh Meadows) said at a Thursday news conference held at one such parcel in Broad Channel, overlooking the salt marshes of Jamaica Bay.

"We certainly cannot recover these vanished ecosystems," Gennaro added, "but we can and must work to protect and restore what remains."

The seven-member Wetlands Transfer Taskforce − created by Gennaro-­authored legislation in 2005 − evaluated 1,020 properties in the city's portfolio, many acquired as a result of foreclosures or former industrial sites.

Robert Pirani, director for environmental programs for the Regional Plan Association, co-chaired the task force.

"The feeling was that by putting [the wetlands] in Parks' ownership, we'd ensure their permanent protection − and, just as importantly, they'd be managed for conservation purposes," he said.

In addition to recommending 82 parcels for parkland status, the task force urged further review on 111 other parcels, totaling 373 acres, including 47

acres in Queens. These parcels are also suitable for parkland, but certain legal snags must first be worked out.

City Hall has until March 27 to transfer the properties - or explain why such actions were not taken, said Gennaro, who is chairman of the Council's Environmental Protection Committee.

City Hall did not return a call seeking comment last week.

Nevertheless, Addabbo (D-Howard Beach), who previously chaired the Council's Parks and Recreation Committee, said prospects for the transfers are good.

"I firmly believe and am very optimistic that the Parks Department will get these wetlands," he said. "They're the right agency to maintain them and to protect them."

In Queens, some of the parcels recommended for transfer are large holdings that border existing parkland, such as wetlands adjoining Idlewild Park Preserve along Jamaica Bay's north shore and portions of the Rockaway Peninsula.

But Broad Channel resident Donna Reardon, who formed a local wetlands preservation group when several city-owned parcels were slated for auction in 2004, said large parcels should not dominate the transfer process.

"I'm hoping that no plot of wetlands is too small to be considered," she said. "Every inch of marshes or wetlands does contribute something to the ecosystem."

jlauinger@nydailynews.com

Thursday, November 1, 2007

Globalwarming.gov | Media Center | Press Releases

Globalwarming.gov

NPR’s “Car Talk” Hosts: No More “Fear-Mongering Bull-feathers” from Automakers

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Select Committee, 202-225-4081


NPR’s “Car Talk” Hosts: No More “Fear-Mongering Bull-feathers” from Automakers

Click and Clack Say We've Let Fuel Economy Get Out of Whack


WASHINGTON (October 30, 2007) – The hosts of National Public Radio’s famed show “Car Talk” have sent a letter to Chairman Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.) and the members of the Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming backing a 35 mile per gallon fuel economy standard for America’s vehicles that is currently being considered in Congress. In the letter, Tom and Ray Magliozzi, aka Click and Clack, the Tappet Brothers, use their renowned wit and vehicle knowledge to knock down the auto industry’s continued resistance to adopt stronger fuel economy standards.

“As any listener knows, Tom and Ray are where common sense begins when it comes to cars, and when they say reaching 35 miles per gallon is feasible and the smart play for the American auto industry, people should listen” said Chairman Markey. “Automakers should stop acting like they’re playing the Tappet Brothers’ game, ‘Stump the Chumps,’ and start supporting higher fuel economy standards in Congress’ energy bill.”

In the letter, Click and Clack argue that technology currently exists to reach a 35 mpg standard in 5 years, nearly a decade before the 2020 timeframe that is currently in the compromise Senate language being considered in Congress. From hybrid technology to rail fuel injection to cylinder deactivation, the brothers’ encyclopedic knowledge of solutions to America’s low fuel economy is on display in the missive, as is their rapier wit.

Here are selected excerpts from the letter, which is available on the Select Committee website:

--The onslaught of ‘we can’t. . .it’ll ruin us. . .you’re denying Americans a choice in vehicles’ begins every time we the people—through our elected representatives—try to bring the auto industry, kicking and screaming into the modern era.

--Every single time [the auto industry has] resisted safety, environmental, or fuel economy regulations, auto industry predictions have turned out, in retrospect, to be fear-mongering bull-feathers.

--The truth is, significantly higher average fuel economy can be achieved. In fact it’s already being achieved. And if we don’t push our own auto industry to set world class standards, they’ll be beaten again by the Japanese, the Koreans, and, maybe even the Chinese. . .

--Not only can it be done, but by increasing CAFE standards dramatically, you’ll be helping the American automotive industry compete—by forcing to synchronize their priorities with those of the American people. . .

Congress is currently considering two energy bills passed by the House and Senate that would reduce oil dependence and cut global warming pollution. The Senate-passed bill, which contains the 35 mpg fuel economy standard and other oil saving provisions, would save more than twice as much oil as we currently import from the Middle East by 2030. The House bill contains groundbreaking provisions to increase our use of renewable energy and make our appliances and buildings more efficient. It is estimated that, by 2030, energy legislation with the best provisions from both bills would reduce the total amount of U.S. heat-trapping emissions by roughly 40 percent of what’s needed to save the planet from dangerous global warming.

# # #
The House Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming was formed by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) to increase the visibility and priority given to America's oil dependence and global warming challenges. It is chaired by Rep. Edward J. Markey (D-MA) and will actively explore the solutions, science and progress on these pressing issues during the 110th Congress.

Friday, October 12, 2007

Gore and U.N. Panel Win Peace Prize for Climate Work - New York Times

Gore and U.N. Panel Win Peace Prize for Climate Work - New York Times

OSLO, Oct. 12 — The Nobel Peace Prize was awarded today to Al Gore, the former vice president, and to the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change for their work to alert the world to the threat of global warming.


Jemal Countess/Getty Images

Mr. Gore and his wife Tipper spoke with United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon at the UN Climate Change Gathering at the end of September.

Related

Prize Caps Year of Highs for Gore (October 12, 2007)

Nobelprize.org

Recent Winners

IPCC Web site

Times Topics: Al Gore

Times Topics: Nobel Prizes

Times Topics: Global Warming


Timothy A. Clary/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

Al and Tipper Gore at the Academy Awards in February.



Cornelius Poppe/European Pressphoto Agency
The chairman of the Norwegian Nobel Committee, Ole Danbolt Mjoes, in Oslo, Norway, today.



Doug Mills/The New York Times
Mr. Gore appeared before a House panel in March.


M J Kim/Getty Images

Mr. Gore in July discussing the Live Earth concerts.

The award immediately renewed calls from Mr. Gore’s supporters for him to run for president in 2008, joining an already crowded field of Democrats. Mr. Gore, who lost the 2000 presidential election to George W. Bush, has said he is not interested in running but has not flatly rejected the notion.

Mr. Gore “is probably the single individual who has done most to create greater worldwide understanding of the measures that need to be adopted,” the Nobel citation said, referring to the issue of climate change. The United Nations committee, a network of 2,000 scientists that was organized in 1988 by the World Meteorological Organization and the United Nations Environment Program, has produced two decades of scientific reports that have “created an ever-broader informed consensus about the connection between human activities and global warming,” the citation said.

Mr. Gore, who was traveling in San Francisco, said in a statement that he was deeply honored to receive the prize and planned to donate his half of the award to the Alliance for Climate Protection, a nonprofit climate group where he is chairman of the board.

“We face a true planetary emergency,” Mr. Gore said in his statement. “The climate crisis is not a political issue; it is a moral and spiritual challenge to all of humanity. It is also our greatest opportunity to lift global consciousness to a higher level.”

Kalee Kreider, a spokeswoman for Mr. Gore, said he received the news with his wife, Tipper, early this morning in San Francisco, where he spoke on Thursday night at a fund-raising event for Senator Barbara Boxer of California, a fellow Democrat.

Ms. Kreider said Mr. Gore would hold strategy meetings with the Alliance for Climate Protection in San Francisco today and return to his home in Nashville over the weekend.

In New Delhi, Rajendra K. Pachauri, an Indian scientist who leads the United Nations committee, said the award was “not something I would have thought of in my wildest dreams.”

In an interview in his office at the Energy and Resources Institute, Dr. Pachauri cast the award as a vindication of science over the skeptics on the effects of human activities on climate change.

“The message that it sends is that the Nobel Prize committee realized the value of knowledge in tackling the problem of climate change and the fact that the I.P.C.C. has an established record of producing knowledge and an impartial and objective assessment of climate change,” he said

Dr. Pachauri said he thought the award would now settle the scientific debate on climate change and that governments would now take action.

He said it was “entirely possible to stabilize the levels of emissions but that climate change and its impact will continue to stalk us.”

“We will have to live with climate change up to a certain point of time but if we want to avoid or delay much more serious damage then its essential that we start mitigation quickly and to a serious extent,” he said.

The Nobel award carries political ramifications in the United States, which the Nobel committee tried to minimize after its announcement today.

The chairman of the Norwegian Nobel Committee, Ole Danbolt Mjoes, addressed reporters after the awards were announced and tried to dismiss repeated questions asking whether the awards were a criticism — direct or indirect — of the Bush administration.

He said the committee was making an appeal to the entire world to unite against the threat of global warming.

"We would encourage all countries, including the big countries, to challenge all of them to think again and to say what can they do to conquer global warming,” he said. “The bigger the powers, the better that they come in front of this.”

He said the peace prize was only a message of encouragement, adding, “the Nobel committee has never given a kick in the leg to anyone.”

In this decade, the Nobel Peace Prize has been given to prominent people and agencies who differ on a range of issues with the Bush administration, including former President Jimmy Carter, who won in 2002, and the United Nations’ nuclear monitoring agency in Vienna and its director, Mohamed ElBaradei, in 2005.

In Washington, a White House spokesman, Tony Fratto, was quoted by Reuters as saying: “Of course we’re happy for Vice President Gore and the I.P.C.C. for receiving this recognition.”

Global warming has been a powerful issue all this year, attracting more and more public attention.

The film documenting Mr. Gore’s campaign to increase awareness of the human effect on climate change, “An Inconvenient Truth,” won an Academy Award this year. The United Nations committee has issued repeated reports and held successive conferences to highlight the growing scientific understanding of the problem. Meanwhile, signs of global warming have become more and more apparent, even in the melting Arctic.

The Norwegian Nobel Committee said global warming “may induce large-scale migration and lead to greater competition for the earth’s resources.”

“Such changes will place particularly heavy burdens on the world’s most vulnerable countries,” it said. “There may be increased danger of violent conflicts and wars, within and between states."

The Bay Area has been the staging area for an online movement to draft Mr. Gore to mount another campaign for the White House. A Web site, www.draftgore.com, claims more than 165,000 signatures and comments on an online petition, including several placed early this morning congratulating Mr. Gore on his win.

The same group also placed a full-page advertisement in The New York Times on Wednesday, pleading with Mr. Gore to rectify his bitter defeat in 2000, when he won the national popular vote but lost the electoral college after the Supreme Court ended a recount in Florida.

“I’ll actually vote for you this time,” wrote one signee, Joshua Kadel of Virginia, on the Web site this morning. “Sorry about 2000!”

The Gores keep an apartment in San Francisco, where their daughter Kristin lives. The city is also the headquarters of Current TV, Mr. Gore’s Emmy-award winning television and online news venture.

Others dedicated to the fight against global warming said the winners were at the head of efforts to investigate and draw attention to the issue.

Michael Oppenheimer, an atmospheric scientist who has participated in the periodic climate assessments since the early days of the I.P.C.C. panel, described the work of the committee, which includes both scientists and government officials, as “a beautiful example of a largely successful experiment in people coming together to improve government.”

“The reward reminds us that expert advice can influence people and policy, that sometimes governments do listen to reason, and that the idea that reason can guide human action is very much alive, if not yet fully realized,” added Dr. Oppenheimer, who is now at Princeton University and previously worked for Environmental Defense, a private advocacy group.

Yvo de Boer, the executive secretary of United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, which is based in Bonn, Germany, and oversaw negotiations that led to the Kyoto Protocol, said recent moves by political leaders around the world to find ways of reducing emissions would have been hard to imagine without the contributions made by both the I.P.C.C. and Mr. Gore.

“We can recommend ways for policy makers to move forward, but without the I.P.C.C. data being there, this would be next to impossible,” Mr. de Boer said. He said Mr. Gore could use his enhanced stature from winning the Peace Prize to focus on parts of the developing world where politicians need support to spread knowledge about the dangers of climate change. “It’s very difficult to advance on these issues without support from the general public,” he said.

Jan Egeland, a Norwegian peace mediator and former senior United Nations official for humanitarian affairs, called climate change more than an environmental issue.

"It is a question of war and peace," Mr. Egeland, now director of the Norwegian Institute of International Affairs in Oslo, told the Associated Press. "We’re already seeing the first climate wars, in the Sahel belt of Africa." He said nomads and herders were in conflict with farmers because the changing climate had brought drought and a shortage of fertile lands.

From the 1980s onward, many scientists and international affairs experts considered the prospect that long-lived gases from human activities could warm the earth to be a threat to global security as well as the environment.

The first large scientific meeting on the issue, the Conference on the Changing Atmosphere, was held in Toronto in 1988. It was also the first meeting to bring together scientists and government officials on a large scale to discuss research pointing to dangerous warming from a buildup of greenhouse gases.

The conference concluded with a statement saying: “Humanity is conducting an unintended, uncontrolled, globally pervasive experiment whose ultimate consequences could be second only to a global nuclear war.”

Its “call to action” included a recommendation that the main heat-trapping gas, carbon dioxide, be cut by 2005 to 20 percent below 1988 levels — a target far more ambitious than anything later discussed in United Nations climate-treaty talks and missed long ago.

The intergovernmental climate panel’s four reports, the first published in 1990, have provided the underpinning for international negotiations leading to the first climate treaty, with only voluntary terms, in 1992 and the 1997 Kyoto Protocol, the first accord with binding terms but with limited support and a 2012 expiration date.

Jesse McKinley contributed reporting from San Francisco, Somini Sengupta from New Delhi, Andrew C. Revkin from New York, and James Kanter from Paris.

Thursday, July 12, 2007

New York Times Blog: Dire Climate Forecast Includes the 100-Year Flood, Once a Decade by Anthony DePalma...


A depiction of the 100-year flood zone in Lower Manhattan shows landmarks and infrastructure that could be frequently flooded in the future unless they are protected. (Graphic: Applied Science Associates Inc.; Sources: Google/Sanborn)


Read original...

Floods that happen every 100 years could come as often as every 10 years by the end of this century, Long Island lobsters will disappear and New York apples will be just a memory if nothing is done to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, according to a new report by the Union of Concerned Scientists.

The report was released at the New York Botanical Garden in the Bronx this morning, in the wake of several days of intense heat, of the kind that scientists warned could come more frequently if business continues as usual. James L. McCarthy, professor of biological oceanography at Harvard and president-elect of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, predicted that New York City might have to swelter through a full month with temperatures above 100 degrees. Prolonged heat could dry up the Catskill Mountains’ waters that supply the city, the report says, and air quality could decline, worsening conditions for people with asthma and allergies.

Seasonal changes, like earlier springs, longer summers and less-snowy winters, are already being seen are the result of heat-trapping gases released over the last century. But scientists said things would become far worse, and much more costly, unless steps are taken now to mitigate the impact.

The report is part of the Northeast Climate Impacts Assessment, which its Web site describes as

a collaboration between the Union of Concerned Scientists and a team of independent experts using state-of-the-art tools to assess how global warming will affect the Northeast under two different scenarios: a higher emissions path with continued rapid growth in global warming pollution, and a lower emissions path with greatly reduced heat trapping emissions.

The eight-page report for New York [pdf] has a map showing wide swaths of the city that would be at greater risk for flooding. The New York report finds that “critical transportation infrastructure located in the Battery could be flooded far more frequently unless protected.”

Without reductions in emissions, sea levels could rise, inundating coastal areas on southern Long Island and pushing water over parts of lower Manhattan, flooding the financial district and pouring water into the subways, making them inoperable, according to the report.

Long Island lobsters would move to cooler waters up north, and without a hard frost to set buds, New York apple trees would not produce as much fruit as before. Under stress from the invasive species, maple beech and birch trees could disappear from certain regions of the state, including the Adirondacks. And since it would often be hotter than dairy cows find to be comfortable, milk production could decline by 15 percent or more in late summer months.

Rohit T. Aggarwala, New York City’s director of long-term planning and stability, said the report adds to “the growing stack of information and rigorous analysis that proves that the debate over climate change is over, and the time for action is now.”

Mr. Aggarwala said that New York City has already taken some steps that will position it to compete on a worldwide basis in the effort to control global warming. He said those efforts range from relatively simple ones, like promoting the use of compact fluorescent bulbs and converting the city’s taxi fleet to hybrid vehicles, to long-range strategic initiatives like congestion pricing.

The report did not include any analysis of the cost to consumers and industry of various efforts to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. But Mr. Aggarwala said it is wrong to think that doing such planning always has a negative cost.

“Many of the things we can and must be doing will pay off because they make the city a better place to live,” he said. “They make New York City more efficient, more effective and more competitive not only around the country but around the world.”

Newsday.com: Global Warming May be Behind Increase in Insects and Disease-carrying Animals by Delthia Ricks...

Read original...

Rising global temperatures may be helping to spark a population boom in insects and disease-carrying animals, creating unexpected threats to human populations, a number of scientific reports say.

Earlier this year a report by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change found that heat waves typified by stagnant masses of warm air that fails to cool at night will intensify throughout North America in the coming decades. A 2005 report by Harvard scientists carried similar findings.

With the arrival of summer, experts say special attention should be paid to ward against insects such as mosquitoes and ticks.

"There is no question that insects do better where it is warm," David Pimentel, a professor of entomology at Cornell University in Ithaca, said Friday.

West Nile disease, which appeared eight years ago in Queens, now has spread across the United States and Canada. Before 1999, it had not existed on the continent. Epidemiologists are uncertain exactly when -- and how -- West Nile, which is spread by birds that carry the virus, reached the United States. Mosquitoes that feed on fowl pick up the virus and transmit it to people.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that 23,975 people have been sickened by West Nile since it first appeared in the United States; 962 have died.

CDC scientists have noted that in 1999 only two subspecies of mosquitoes were carriers of the disease: Ades vexans and Culex pipiens. Now, entomologists have identified 62 subspecies of mosquitoes that carry the virus.

The saga of West Nile, Pimentel and other experts say, does not differ much from stories of other diseases that are borne by vectors and are now being spread in regions where they didn't exist before.

World Health Organization scientists have identified more than two dozen diseases that are flourishing in regions that once were characterized by icy winters. As winters warm, niches are created for disease vectors, such as mosquitoes. Lyme disease-carrying ticks have been detected on penguins in Antarctica, some experts say.

Some scientists speculate that climate change has already triggered epidemics in regions where people are not braced for the onslaught: Malaria-carrying mosquitoes, for example, are flying to higher elevations in Africa and South America because they are no longer limited by what were once colder temperatures at higher altitudes.

"Mosquitoes thrive in warm, moist conditions," Pimentel said. "Ticks also do better under warm conditions. They are going through their life cycle faster. For example, rather than going through a life cycle in three weeks, it's now estimated that some mosquitoes go through it in two weeks.

"That means there are more generations per year and of course that adds to the overall population of mosquitoes."

Dr. Richard Horowitz, president of the International Lyme and Associated Diseases Society in Bethesda, Md., said global warming may be driving the proliferation of the Ixodes scapularis tick, or deer tick, which carries the bacterium Borrelia burgdorferi.

He also said global warming appears to be aiding a population boom in mice, especially the white-footed mouse, which carries Lyme disease ticks.

"Global warming is kind of a paradox when it comes to ticks," Horowitz said. "Ticks don't generally do well in direct sunlight. They like moisture, which is why they exist at the edges of lawns," usually where it is shady, especially when there is a canopy of trees and shrubs.

Wednesday, July 11, 2007

NY Post: Queens GI Teen Killed in Iraq by Jennifer Cook

Read original:

July 11, 2007 -- A Queens soldier who wanted to serve in the Army so badly, he got his mother to give him permission to join early as a 17th-birthday present, was killed in Iraq, the military said yesterday.

Pfc. Le Ron Wilson, 18, of Rosedale, was killed Friday in Baghdad when his vehicle struck an explosive.

'He was always interested in the military,' said his mother, Simona Francis, 42.

'When he was 16, he told me don't buy him a birthday present. He just wanted me to sign the papers for him to join the Army as his 17th birthday present.'

Although relatives tried to talk Wilson out of it, his mom finally agreed.

'I always told him I would support him in anything he wanted to do in his life, and that is what he truly wanted,' she said.

Francis called her son 'a very selfless person who was loved by all his schoolmates' at Thomas Edison Vocational HS.

Meanwhile, the military yesterday also announced the noncombat death of Marine Lance Cpl. Angel Ramirez, 28, of Brooklyn."

Friday, June 22, 2007

BBC NEWS: Inuit Sue US Over Climate Policy By Richard Black...



People living in the Arctic have filed a legal petition against the US government, saying its climate change policies violate human rights.

The Inuit Circumpolar Conference (ICC) claims the US is failing to control emissions of greenhouse gases, damaging livelihoods in the Arctic.

Its petition to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights demands that the US limits its emissions.

Temperatures in the Arctic are rising at about twice the global average.

The Arctic Climate Impact Assessment, a vast scientific study which took four years to compile, found that the region will warm by four to seven degrees Celsius by the end of the century, with summer sea ice disappearing within 60 years.

Anecdotal evidence suggests that impacts are already being felt, with seasonal melting leading to the collapse of buildings and a reduction in some fish stocks.

The petition, filed on behalf of the ICC by the Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL), says US policies on greenhouse gas emissions are a major factor driving these changes.

"The United States is the world's largest greenhouse gas emitter; it has turned its back on the Kyoto Protocol and has not put in place measures to limit its emissions," said CIEL's senior attorney Donald Goldberg.

"The Inuit are bearing the brunt," he told the BBC News website.

Violation of rights

The petition asks the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights to investigate the harm caused to Inuit by global warming, and to declare the US "...in violation of rights affirmed in the 1948 American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man and other instruments of international law."

Image showing reduction in Arctic ice.  Image: Nasa/AFP/Getty

It also urges the Commission to rule that the US must adopt mandatory limits on greenhouse gas emissions and "...help Inuit adapt to unavoidable impacts of climate change."

If the Commission rules in favour of the Inuit, it could refer the US to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights for a legal judgement.

Both the Commission and the Court work within the framework of the American Convention on Human Rights.

As the US has not ratified the Convention, a ruling by the Commission would be largely symbolic; but Donald Goldberg believes that does not make it worthless.

"If the Commission finds the US has violated human rights, it's a serious matter," he said.

"States don't like to be classified as violators of human rights; and in any case, there is a domestic legal mechanism called the Alien Torts Claims Act which might allow us to use a Commission judgement in national litigation."

The petition is the latest in a series of legal or quasi-legal cases filed against the US government and others over climate change.

The US is being asked to protect coral species threatened by climate change, Australian authorities have been forced to review procedures plans for approving coal-fired power stations, while an application in Germany would force the government to declare what greenhouse gas emissions are produced by projects supported by its export credit agency.

The biggest victory for legal campaigns on climate, co-ordinated by the group Climate Justice, came in November when a Nigerian court ordered oil companies to stop "gas flaring" - burning off gas from their oil wells.