Showing posts with label yankee stadium. Show all posts
Showing posts with label yankee stadium. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 22, 2010

Parks Near Yankee Stadium Set to Open, But Critics Say City is Still Shortchanging Residents by Mike Jaccarino - NY Daily News

Read original...

City Parks Department officials will give an update on the status of Heritage Field, which is expected to be build near the new Yankee Stadium. Above, the old stadium is demolished. Spak for News

Things are finally on schedule.

That's the message that city Parks Department officials are expected to deliver Monday night at their quarterly update on the redevelopment of parkland around the new Yankee Stadium.

After years of delays and red tape, the city has opened several new parks around the Stadium, and says it has a firm sense of when it will complete the much anticipated Heritage Field.

Critics still charge that the city is shortchanging local residents, who saw the destruction of some 25 acres of parkland around Yankee Stadium when the Bombers built their new home.

Only about 22 acres are being redeveloped in the area directly around the Stadium, said Geoffrey Croft of NYC Park Advocates, a Parks Department watchdog group.

Department regulations require Parks to replace every acre of parkland that was destroyed when building the new Yankee Stadium.

Croft said the city is coming up at least 3 acres short in its current plans. City officials insist they are redeveloping not 22 - but more than 32 - acres around the Stadium. Croft calls this a "fabrication."

"It's a dog and pony show, and they basically shrug their shoulders and act like everything is okay," Croft said of the quarterly updates. "The thing is a mess. It's just a mess."

At Monday night's meeting, officials are expected to announce that the River Ave. skate park is completed, and set for a formal ribbon-cutting that will take place this month.

The River Ave. playground is expected to be completed by the end of June.

The city Economic Development Corporation, which is overseeing most of the redevelopment, will announce that Heritage Field - on the site of the now demolished House That Ruth Built - is expected to be completed by the fall of 2011. It will include three new baseball fields.

Last week, earthmovers and other construction vehicles were already being used there.

Monday night's meeting will take place at the Bronx district attorney's office, 198 E. 161st St., third floor, from 6 p.m. to 8 p.m. The meeting is open to the public, and a question and answer session will follow the presentation.

Sentiment among area residents polled recently concerning the efforts at parkland redevelopment was mixed.

"They took away a lot," said Joseph Texeira, 39, of Jerome Ave. as he walked his dog through Macombs Dam Park. "The old jogging field was much better. The new one is all artificial turf and it feels fake. There's no trees. It's just not natural."

Michael Smith, 35, of 149th St., disagreed as he wrapped up a run around the new track, Joseph Yancy Track and Field, while a number of others jogged around it on a recent morning.

The facility also includes four basketball courts, eight handball courts and fitness equipment.

"This is beautiful," said Smith. "It's just beautiful. When I called my mother and told her about this, she was shocked because she remembered what the Bronx used to be like.

"I mean, this is a full-fledged field. They may have taken some away when they built the new stadium, but look at what they gave back."

"I'm not happy," said 10-year-old Jason Miller, as he played with friends in John Mullaly Park.

"They took our park away and the new one isn't finished yet. I've been coming here all my life and I didn't see why the Yankees needed a new stadium. The old one was fine."

The redevelopment project has been fraught with delays and controversy.

The skate park was originally set to open in 2007 and Joseph Yancy Track and Field, which opened in April, was initially scheduled for completion in 2009.

Friday, June 4, 2010

A Must Watch Video - Stadium Status by Internets Celebrities

Stadium Status from Internets Celebrities on Vimeo.



"It's hard being a sports fan these days."

Stadium Status is a documentary which examines the rush of new sports stadiums in NYC as the latest example of an obscene national trend. New stadiums are built every year and the private businesses that own them benefit from huge sums of public money for their creation. Are we getting our money's worth?

Internets Celebrities are Dallas Penn, Rafi Kam and director Casimir Nozkowski
Featuring Neil deMause and Killian Jordan
Additional Cinematography - Ian Savage
Original Music - Bless-1

Stadium Status was funded by fans of the Internets Celebrities via Kickstarter including a sponsorship from our friends at DIYThemes -- the company behind the Thesis theme for Wordpress. We are grateful for everyone's support.

More videos and Internets Celebrities updates at internetscelebrities.com

Thursday, June 3, 2010

Wednesday, May 26, 2010

John Fogerty to Perform 'Centerfield' Live at Baseball Hall of Fame Induction Ceremony in July by David Hinckley - NY Daily News

Read original...



Festivities at the first opening day at Yankee Stadium. John Fogerty plays a bat-shaped guitar and sings his baseball anthem "Centerfield"

Andre Dawson played center field, John Fogerty sang "Centerfield," and in an unusual twist, both will be honored at the baseball Hall of Fame induction ceremony July 25.

Dawson, who also played right field with Montreal and the Chicago Cubs, was previously announced as a Class of 2010 inductee alongside Veterans Committee selections Whitey Herzog and umpire Doug Harvey.

Tuesday the Hall is announcing that Fogerty will perform "Centerfield" to kick off the ceremony and then be honored to mark the 25th anniversary of the song's release. "I'm overwhelmed and truly humbled," Fogerty said on Monday. "I had no idea the song would ever be adopted by baseball."

While Fogerty is a Hall of Famer himself - the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame, Class of 1993 - the former Creedence Clearwater Revival frontman said sharing a stage with baseball greats is a different level of thrill. "As a young boy who loved baseball, I grew up thinking baseball players were very special people, not like the rest of us," he said. "I never thought I'd be connected to them in any way except maybe getting an autograph."

[Photo caption: John Fogerty is 'humbled' to play 'Centerfield' at the Hall of Fame induction ceremony.]

Noting he was born in California before baseball expanded west, Fogerty said his first team was the Yankees, but that he now roots for the Oakland A's. His recording of "Centerfield" has been played at the Cooperstown induction for more than a decade.

Sunday, November 30, 2008

Weiner: Wrong for City to Trade Tax Breaks for Luxury Baseball Perks

Representative Anthony Weiner (D – Brooklyn and Queens), co-chair of the Bipartisan Congressional Caucus on the Middle Class, released the following statement today on news of the City's efforts to secure perks for a luxury suite at Yankees Stadium:

Rep. Weiner said, "It is wrong for city officials to trade tax breaks for luxury perks at a baseball stadium. During these challenging economic times, the City should have the Yankees repay the City for the value of these luxury boxes or auction them off. If city officials want to catch a game, they should purchase tickets just like every other New Yorker."

In October, Rep. Weiner released an analysis of luxury box perks at the new Yankee and Mets stadiums and found that the $1.3 million the City could retrieve from selling the luxury box perks would:

- Hire 29 new teachers
- Hire 30 new police officers
- Hire 36 new firefighters
- Build 1 new little league field

City Pressed Hard for Use of Luxury Suite at Yankee Stadium by David W. Chen - NYTimes.com

Read original...

Some tough negotiations led to the City of New York’s obtaining the right to use a luxury suite at the new Yankee Stadium. Uli Seit for The New York Times


The Bloomberg administration was so intent on obtaining a free luxury suite for its own use at the new Yankee Stadium, newly released e-mail messages show, that the mayor’s aides pushed for a larger suite and free food, and eventually gave the Yankees 250 additional parking spaces in exchange.

The parking spaces were given to the team for the private use of Yankees officials, players and others; the spaces were originally planned for public parking. The city also turned over the rights to three new billboards along the Major Deegan Expressway, and whatever revenue they generate, as part of the deal.

The e-mail messages between the aides to Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg and Yankees executives were obtained and released by Assemblyman Richard L. Brodsky, Democrat of Westchester, who questions whether taxpayers were adequately protected in the city’s deal with the team.

Mr. Brodsky said what emerges from the e-mail correspondence is a sense of entitlement ingrained in Bloomberg officials. He said that the city appeared to be pushing for use of the suite for not just regular-season games, but for the playoffs and the World Series, and for special events like concerts, too.

“There’s this ‘Alice in Wonderland’ quality to the question of, what is the public interest here and who’s protecting it?” said Mr. Brodsky, who conducted a hearing on the issue of public financing of sports stadiums this summer. “We can’t find the money for the M.T.A., or schools, or hospitals, and these folks are used to the perks and good things of life, and expect them.”

The city maintains it was simply trying to obtain a luxury suite comparable to that given to other cities involved in stadium or arena projects. But the message traffic, which dates to January 2006, raises questions, too, about how sincere city officials were when they recently stated publicly that the box could be used to reward outstanding city workers, rather than mainly for the mayor, dignitaries and aides. The notion of inviting city workers as guests is not mentioned in the e-mail messages until Aug. 7, 2008, and only then in response to an inquiry from a reporter.

The city’s push for the perks has been known, at least broadly speaking, since Mr. Brodsky began raising questions earlier this year about the stadium deals for the Yankees and Mets, from whom the city also secured a luxury box. But the e-mail messages offer a revealing snapshot of the behavior and marching orders of the people involved in the deal for the construction of the billion-dollar Yankee Stadium.

It is hard to determine the precise value of what the city gave the Yankees as part of the exchange. The public parking, though perhaps a convenience to those who drive to the stadium, was to be run by a parking garage operator, not the city, before it was turned over to the Yankees for team use. The billboards would most likely generate about $750,000 annually, given their location. The Yankees are expected to charge $600,000 to $850,000 a year for stadium luxury suites, according to reports.

The project required permission from the Internal Revenue Service because of the team’s desire to use tax-exempt bonds to finance construction. In one heated exchange, city lawyers threatened they would not make the request to the I.R.S. for the use of the tax-exempt financing unless the Yankees would consider providing the luxury suite.

Lonn Trust, the Yankees chief operating officer, wrote to the city on Jan. 26, 2006: “For clarity, no seats, no suites, no tickets, and as they say in Brooklyn ‘No nothin’.’ ”

In response, a lawyer for the city, Joseph Gunn, warned that “No nothin’ can go both ways,” adding that if the luxury suite was not included, “We do not submit the letter ruling request.”

“Suite negotiations between the city and the New York Yankees were part of lengthy discussions with the city involving a whole host of different deal points,” said Alice McGillion, a spokeswoman for the Yankees.

At another point, raw personal feelings emerged, as evidenced during this exchange, starting June 29, 2006, between top city officials about Randy Levine, the Yankees president.

“If we want a deal on the suite, he wants 250 spaces,” Seth W. Pinsky, then the executive vice president of the city’s Economic Development Corporation, wrote to Daniel L. Doctoroff, a former deputy mayor. After Mr. Doctoroff did not respond, Mr. Pinsky, a bit sheepishly, wrote the next day: “It comes down to how much we’re willing to rely on Randy’s word.”

“Let’s not give,” Mr. Doctoroff replied. “I don’t trust him.”

Another theme that emerges is Mr. Bloomberg’s interest in the stadiums. In one e-mail message on July 5, 2006, about the Mets’ new stadium, Mr. Pinsky noted: “This is a big issue to the mayor.”

David Lombino, a spokesman for the city’s Economic Development Corporation, cautioned against reading too much into the e-mail messages.

“Securing the option to use a box at the stadium was one part of a much larger, comprehensive negotiation where we sought the best deal possible for the city,” he said. “Our goal was to make sure that New York had the same advantages as other cities, including the option to use a box, be it for staff outings, for public employees or for visiting dignitaries. The mayor’s office has indicated that no decision has been made as to whether or not it will exercise the option, but it exists for this and future administrations.”

A Bloomberg spokesman, Andrew Brent, echoed those ideas, saying, “As a matter of equity, it was important to us throughout the negotiations that the Yankees were not exempted from such gives or treated any differently than other teams.”

In response to recent questions from reporters, Mr. Pinsky, who is now the president of the Economic Development Corporation, has played down the importance of the luxury suite, saying he did not understand what all the fuss was about.

But the messages show that he and other aides were anything but casual about the matter, with issues like the location and size of the box of obvious concern.

When the team agreed to an 8-seat box, the city successfully demanded 12 seats.

And on July 7, 2006, Mr. Pinsky informed Mr. Doctoroff that the Yankees had told him: “The location of the box is in left field, but before the foul pole. Also, it is designed to project out, so that it will have a direct view down the third base line.”

The city also demanded that the luxury suite be provided with food — just like all the other suites. But the Yankees balked.

In one message dated July 26, 2006, Stephen Lefkowitz, a Yankees lawyer, wrote to Mr. Pinsky: “Seth — Randy believes he told you ‘no food’ and that you agreed. If this is so, please let me know and we can drop this from our list of irritants.”

The city, of course, disagreed. And that prompted Mr. Lefkowitz to respond this way: “It’s really ridiculous, but it sticks like a bone in everyone’s craw. The Yankees feel the city should pay for any food it wants to consume, and I think it’s a little unseemly to require ‘free’ food.”

He added: “For this I went to law school — sigh.”

Saturday, July 12, 2008

Former Yankee Outfielder Bobby Murcer Dies At 62 - WNBC | New York

Read original...



News 4 New York has learned that former Yankees outfielder Bobby Murcer has died after a battle with brain cancer. He was 62.Murcer played for the Yankees from 1965-74 and 1979-83 and became a broadcaster with the team after retiring in 1983.

Murcer was diagnosed with brain cancer on Christmas Eve in 2006 after an MRI revealed a malignant brain tumor, according to The Daily News. A five-time major league All Star and Gold Glove winner in 1972, Murcer spent 17 years in the Major League.

Sunday, June 29, 2008

City Choosing to Forget - Selective Memory on Display in Uproar Over Delayed Yankees’ Parkland by Patrick Arden - metro

Read original...

When did the Bloomberg administration know that it was replacing parks lost to the new Yankee Stadium with polluted land?

That was the question City Councilwoman Helen Foster asked yesterday at a hearing on the project’s delays.

Costs to the city have doubled in the last two years, with the replacement parks’ bill climbing 84 percent to around $190 million. Yesterday, officials attributed part of the sticker shock to “unanticipated” cleanup.

“I can assure you that there was no attempt to underplay the cost,” said Liam Kavanagh of the Parks Department. But the city knew its replacement park parcels were contaminated — it’s even mentioned in the project’s initial environmental review. In 2006, Metro detailed the massive amount of pollution the city had found at the site.

The review acknowledged toxins exceeding state standards “were detected in soil samples from throughout the project area.”

Oil contamination was identified in dirt and groundwater.

National Park Service executive Jack Howard noted soil near the Harlem River had “petroleum-like odors.” With reason: The lot had hosted a Valvoline Oil facility and a power plant.

Saturday, June 14, 2008

'Soviet-Style' Tactics Said To Be Used To Help Yanks by Peter Kiefer - The New York Sun

Read original...

City and state officials are working in concert to convince the Internal Revenue Service to make it easier to get access to hundreds of millions of dollars in tax-exempt financing for the construction of the Yankees, Mets, and Nets stadiums.

All three projects have already received hundreds of millions of dollars in tax-exempt bond financing, but the city and state are seeking more, which has angered a number of watchdog groups and state legislators.

"These decisions are being made in secret in these Soviet-style meetings and it is outrageous," the chairman of the Assembly's Committee on Corporations, Authorities and Commissions, Richard Brodsky, said. On Wednesday, it was disclosed that the Yankees had approached the city about seeking an additional $350 million in tax-exempt financing.

"The city is working in Washington to seek relief on the IRS regulations," the president of the New York City Economic Development Corp., Seth Pinsky, said in an interview yesterday.

Since the 1986 Tax Reform Act was enacted during the Reagan administration, private development companies have faced tight restrictions when attempting to get access to tax-exempt bonds for sports facilities.

In 2006, with the support of the Bloomberg administration, the Yankees and the Mets were able to circumvent the federal regulation by employing a complex accounting technique that allows the bond debt to be paid by the city and state with money received from the private developer, known as payments in lieu of taxes.

Now the IRS is considering closing the loophole for future projects, a move city officials say would hinder development. They say that more private development projects should be able to get the benefits of tax-exempt bonding.

"They have taken away a tool that would be useful for a number of New York City development projects. Ideally we would like the ability to use this financing tool more broadly," Mr. Pinsky said.

The bonds, exempt from city, state, and federal taxes, are said to have an interest rate of about 25% below taxable bonds. According to the city's Independent Budget Office, the construction of the new Yankee stadium has already received $920 million in tax-exempt bond financing, resulting in savings of $190 million in tax payments for the Yankees.

Taxpayers are ultimately forced to pick up part of that tab. According to the Independent Budget Office, the city's treasury lost $10 million in taxes, the state $18 million, and the federal government $200 million.

City officials see the bonds as a relatively inexpensive way to subsidize development, specifically because the federal government picks up a greater share of the tab.

"What is advantageous is that the vast majority is paid for by federal taxes as a result the city loses a small amount of money," Mr. Pinsky said. "We are leveraging a small amount of city and state funds to get a substantial amount of federal assistance."

Bettina Damiani, a project director at a government watchdog group, Good Jobs New York, questions why the city would seek a break from Washington on sports stadium projects when there are so many other pressing infrastructure problems in the city that need additional financing.

"Doesn't the mayor have better things to do than be asking Washington for money to help the Yankees?" she said.

The writer of the book "Field of Schemes," Neil deMause, says the accounting trick used for the Yankees and Mets stadiums counters the intent of the 1986 Tax Reform Act. "At a certain point, this is a huge way for the cities to raid the federal treasury, and let everybody borrow tax exempt money," he said.

Mr. Pinsky said all the funds had been cleared by the IRS. He also said that the developer Forest City Ratner Co. had expressed interest to the city about seeking additional tax-exempt funding, but that the request was being handled by the state.

"We are not making an end-run around anyone," Mr. Pinsky said. "The IRS issued a letter saying what we are doing was perfectly legal."

A spokeswoman for the Yankees, Alice McGillion, said it was always the intent to be seeking additional tax-exempt funding, but she said the exact sum that would be sought had not been determined.

While in Washington yesterday, Mayor Bloomberg was asked about the possibility of additional subsidies for Yankee Stadium.

"With the current regulations, we couldn't give out any more interest-subsidized bonds. So it's an interesting thing. We'll talk to them certainly, as we'd talk to anyone building anything large in the city. But I think it's premature. We would like to see them do it without any more assistance, and whether they can do that or not, I don't know," he said.

Photo courtesy of MLB Snagging Baseball Blog...

Friday, June 13, 2008

Yankees Seek More Public Financing for New Stadium by Michael Frazier AND Jennifer Sinco Kelleher -- Newsday.com

Read original...

The Yankees have informally approached New York City officials seeking increased public funding to build their new stadium, the president of the city economic development corporation said Wednesday night.

Seth Pinksy, president of New York City Economic Development Corp., stressed that the discussions with the Yankee organization have been "informal inquiries" and not "intensive negotiations."

State Assemb. Richard Brodsky (D-Westchester), whose committee investigates publicly funded projects, told The Associated Press that the Yankees now say that if they don't get another $400 million in public funding the stadium might not reach completion.

The $1.3 billion stadium is scheduled to open next year across from its current site.

Saturday, May 31, 2008

Costs and Delays Mount for Replacing Parks Around Yankee Stadium by Tomothy Williams - NYTimes.com

Read original...

Anthony Santiago, left, and his twin brother, Christopher, playing in a temporary park at Jerome Avenue and East 161st Street.

The cost of replacing two popular parks where the new Yankee Stadium is being built has nearly doubled. At the same time, several of the eight new parks, which were supposed to be completed before the new stadium opens next spring, have been delayed by as much as two years, according to city documents.

The price of the new small parks — which are to replace tennis and basketball courts, a running track and baseball and soccer fields eliminated to make way for the new stadium — is now projected to be $174 million, almost one-seventh the cost of the $1.3 billion stadium itself. The original estimate had been $95.5 million. The increase comes amid skyrocketing costs for construction projects, both public and private, around the city.

The stadium is being financed by the Yankees with city subsidies, while the eight new parks for the South Bronx, which range in size from 0.24 acre to 8.9 acres, are being paid for by the city.

None of the replacement parks have been completed, and construction on several has not yet started; however, the parks department has built a temporary replacement park on a parking lot in the area, opened a ball field this spring at a school almost a mile to the east, and is building a sports field at a recreation center about a mile to the north.

The city was required to build the new parks after it selected the 28.4-acre Macombs Dam Park and a portion of the 18.5-acre John Mullaly Park as the site of the new stadium in 2005. State and federal law dictated that a similar amount of parkland nearby of equal or greater fair market value be built to replace the parks that would be lost.

Some residents have been critical of the trade-off. While Macombs Dam and Mullaly Parks were almost contiguous stretches of grass and trees amid the concrete topography of the South Bronx, the replacement parks are small parcels scattered around the area. The sites include sports fields atop a planned stadium parking garage and a park along the Harlem River, which is on the opposite side of the Major Deegan Expressway.

Cost estimates for eight small parks around the new Yankee Stadium have almost doubled.

The parks department has predicted a net increase of 2.14 acres of parkland in the swap, to 24.56 acres from 22.42 acres. But that has failed to quell some local disappointment.

“We’ve lost our biggest park, and what we’ve been reduced to is this parking lot,” said Anita Antonetty, 51, a South Bronx resident, referring to the temporary park at Jerome Avenue and East 161st Street. “We lost hundreds of trees that were 80 years old, and now there’s this monstrosity of cement across the street from where people live.”

The parks department gave the $95.5 million cost estimate for the replacement parks as part of the city’s final environmental impact study for the stadium project in August 2006.

In March, Adrian Benepe, the parks commissioner, told the City Council parks committee that the figure had climbed to $190 million. Last week, Jama Adams, a department spokeswoman, put the cost estimate for the replacement parks at $174 million — about $16 million less than Mr. Benepe’s figure — but said that it might continue to grow. She said Mr. Benepe had spoken “off the top of his head.”

The estimated cost of the replacement parks now almost matches the amount the parks department has spent building and refurbishing parks and recreation centers throughout the Bronx over the past six years. Since 2002, the agency has spent $178 million on parks and recreation centers in the borough, according to department figures.

Parks officials said the cost of the replacement parks had risen because of a series of unforeseen circumstances, including the discovery of buried oil barrels beneath one of the future parks and construction costs that have been rising 1.5 percent each month.

“This increase to city funds covers conditions we have recently encountered that simply could not be anticipated beforehand,” the department said in a May 12 report provided to The New York Times.

As part of a further explanation, Ms. Adams wrote in an e-mail message that “construction costs have continued to increase at a rate beyond what we anticipated, we have added new aspects to our projects, and we have learned new things about the sites that have affected our design and infrastructure work.”

Ms. Adams added that the cost of building the stadium had also increased, by about 60 percent, although Yankees officials have said the stadium will be completed on time next spring, even if the replacement parks are delayed.

Mr. Benepe declined to be interviewed for this article. Ms. Adams said it was typical for costs to increase as projects proceed from the design stage.

The parks department attributed the delays of as long as two years for the replacement parks to “unforeseen site conditions and new design aspects.”

The delays mean the neighborhood will go at least five years without some of its sports fields: Stadium construction in Macombs Dam Park started in 2006, and the permanent replacement park will not be completed until 2011.

The Bronx borough president, Adolfo Carrión Jr., a supporter of the stadium project and the parks plan, said through a spokeswoman that he was briefed monthly by the parks department.

“As of today, the project remains on schedule,” the spokeswoman, Anne Fenton, said in an e-mail message last week. “We have made sure that the parks department is meeting on a regular basis with the community and addressing any concerns.”

But opponents of the stadium project said they are not surprised by the problems surrounding it.

“The real emphasis was on building a stadium for the Yankees, and the community and the parks were an inconvenient afterthought,” said Christian DiPalermo, executive director of New Yorkers for Parks, an advocacy group. “The Yankees couldn’t miss a season, but it was O.K. for the community to miss five years of parkland and be shut out of a community benefits agreement.”

Under a community benefits program agreement between the Yankees and Bronx elected officials, intended to help mitigate the effects of the stadium construction, Bronx charities were to receive $800,000 annually once construction started. But only $11,500 of that money has been distributed so far, according to the group that administers the fund.

The temporary park at Jerome Avenue and 161st Street was meant to provide a measure of tranquillity and recreational space as the stadium construction opened last spring, but it was almost a year behind schedule, according to city documents. Now heavily used, it will be paved over for a stadium parking garage once the replacement parks are finished.

With the exception of Heritage Field, a park planned for the grounds of the existing Yankee Stadium, the city said in its 2006 environmental impact report that the replacement parks would be ready by next year.

“By 2009, all of the replacement parkland and recreational facilities would be constructed,” the report stated. Residents said parks officials told them at the time that the parks would be finished by April 2009, in time for opening day at the new stadium.

But the department now says that much of the work will not be finished until almost a year later, including a park that will house a permanent 400-meter running track, four basketball courts, a combination soccer and football field and eight handball courts.

Heritage Field, which will have three sports fields, has also been delayed nearly a year — from December 2010 to the fall of 2011. The park is expected to cost $50 million, a figure that includes the demolition of the existing Yankee Stadium, the parks department said.

Work on two other replacement parks — each smaller than a half-acre — which had been scheduled for completion by October 2007 will not begin until next month, the parks department said.

Another replacement park, a 5.8-acre parcel on the Harlem River waterfront that is expected to cost $56 million to build, was also scheduled to be finished by last October, but will not open until sometime in the winter of 2009, the department said.

Broken Promises:The City’s Replacement Park Scheme For The New Yankee Stadium Project - NYC Parks Advocates.org

Read original...

Broken Promises:

The City’s Replacement Park Scheme For

The New Yankee Stadium Project


"Parks - Are we losing important green space including parks and playgrounds? NO. The new stadium project will actually create more acres of parkland than currently exist including a new six-acre park on the Harlem River, a track, tennis courts, racquetball courts, basketball courts, a soccer field and an ice skating rink."

Excerpt from a mailer paid for by the New York Yankees community relations department and sent to neighborhood residents in the Bronx during the "public review" period of the Yankee Stadium ULURP (Uniform Land Use Review Procedure) application to construct the new Yankee Stadium on public parkland.

INTRODUCTION

In June 2005, without a single public hearing and over the course of just eight days, City and State elected officials alienated 25.3 acres of historic South Bronx parkland to allow the New York Yankees to build a new stadium. As part of this action, the Bloomberg and Pataki administrations and the Yankees organization repeatedly promised the community that not only would the parks be replaced but even more parkland would be provided in return. However, a close examination reveals that just 21.78 of the 25.3 acres are actually being replaced, resulting in a net loss of nearly 4 acres. Whenever this deficiently has been exposed, the City's Department of Parks and Recreation has constantly altered the numbers to create a false impression. Of the replacement park acreage the city now claims, 58% (12.5 acres) already existed as either mapped parkland or, in one case, as a school yard. Also lost is the long promised dedicated funding desperately needed to maintain the replacement parks. And that's only the beginning of the broken promises.

Various State and Federal laws pertaining to the alienation and conversion of municipal parkland to non-park uses require that new parkland acting as a replacement must be of equivalent or greater value. For a variety of reasons, the local community has long argued that the replacement parks fail to meet the criteria, and that they fail to provide a similar level of usefulness or location. The city has attempted to pass off a disparate collection of parcels as "replacements," including building replacement parkland on top of existing parkland. Many of these concerns can be summarized as follows:

  • The plan calls for replacing large linear parks that provided active recreation with smaller park features spread out in many areas and over wider distances – up to 1.4 miles away – some on top of parking garages.
  • More than half of the replacement parkland the City is relying on to meet its obligation has existed as mapped parkland that the public has used for decades.
  • Former park amenities such as a heavily used natural turf ballfield and an asphalt ballfield are not being replaced with similar active recreation facilities. In the case of the asphalt ballfield, the City has simply refused to acknowledge its recreational use.
  • Parkland acreage previously used for active recreation is being replaced, in part, by a concrete pedestrian walkway. Some of the replacement acreage is also passive park acreage from other projects that were either promised under other park plans or previously unrelated to the stadium project.
  • The replacement plan substitutes parkland that was free and open to the public with a significantly larger pay-to-play tennis concession – in a flood zone.

The replacement parkland plan also carries significant environmental and public health impacts. The project destroyed 70% of the community's mature trees, and aims to convert much of the previous parkland's natural features such as grass into artificial and impervious surfaces. The health benefits provided from the previous natural park features were numerous and critical to the well-being and safety of a community that suffers from the highest asthma rates in the country. As noted in the project's environmental impact statement (EIS), the health benefits from the replacement trees alone won't be realized for decades, if ever.

Read entire report...

Friday, April 4, 2008

Put That Way, $354M Isn’t That Much Cash by Patrick Arden - New York Metro

Read original...

Champions of congestion pricing wonder why any politician would turn down $354 million. The feds have offered just that to implement Mayor Bloomberg’s traffic fee.

But the city and the state already spend that kind of dough on projects that don’t seem as vital as mass transit.

They’ve committed $403 million to the Yankee Stadium project, for example, and just one city program granted $409 million in property tax breaks last year to Midtown office towers like the MetLife Building and such fast-food outlets as McDonald’s.

City workers have staged protests against a $410 million payroll system that uses biometric devices, including palm scanners. “They say it will reduce ‘buddy punching,’” said a union spokesman, “but we’ve not had one case of that in ten years.”

“While $354 million sounds like a huge amount of money, it will be almost gone before you start congestion pricing,” said Brooklyn Councilman Lewis Fidler.

The MTA puts its necessary upgrades at $767 million. The tolling system would take $73 million, and the operating cost is $62 annually.

But tolls are supposed to net $491 million a year, and that money would go to the MTA, which by 2010 could be handing over 20 percent of its operating budget just to service its debt. Even with congestion pricing, the MTA needs $9 billion more to pay for its new five-year capital plan.

It goes quickly

A handful of things that cost a bit more than the $354 million in federal funds the city will get for congestion pricing:

• The city and state’s contribution to the Yankee Stadium project

• A city payroll system that uses biometric devices to track workers

• Tax breaks to landlords and developers under just one program

• The scrapped 7 line station at 10th Avenue and 41st Street

Wednesday, April 2, 2008

Yankees’ First Victory in a Season of Lasts by Tyler Kepner - New York Times

Read original...

It was the first day of the end of its life, the final opener at Yankee Stadium, where the countdown to demolition has begun. After five innings Tuesday night, George Steinbrenner, whose fortune is financing most of the construction across 161st Street, pulled a lever in his office, and the scoreboard digits flipped to 80.


Barton Silverman/The New York Times

Yankees Manager Joe Girardi greeting Jorge Posada at the end of the game.

More Photos »

That is how many regular-season games remain at the ballpark that has housed 26 championship teams. Joe Girardi wants to guide the next one, and the early returns are encouraging.

Thirty hours after the season was supposed to start, Chien-Ming Wang fired a called strike on a dry, 64-degree night. The promise of summer was there on a crisp spring evening, when the Yankees edged the Toronto Blue Jays, 3-2, before 55,112 fans. The Yankees have won their home opener 11 years in a row.

The game ball found Girardi at the end, when it felt like old times for the new skipper and former catcher. Mariano Rivera earned his 444th career save and his first for a manager other than Joe Torre. He gave Girardi the prize.

“Special,” Girardi said. “It kind of reminded me of when I actually used to catch Mo. What a great feeling it was when the door opened and he came in, and I had that same feeling tonight.”

Alex Rodriguez doubled home a run in the first inning and singled to start the go-ahead rally in the seventh. Melky Cabrera dazzled on defense and lifted a home run down the right-field line, another gift from the old ballpark. Wang, Joba Chamberlain and Rivera stymied Toronto.

“You get seven from Wang and one from Joba and Mariano,” catcher Jorge Posada said. “That’s what we need to do all year.”

Wang allowed six hits and two runs in seven innings, and Chamberlain struck out his final two hitters in the eighth, twirling and punching the sky after pumping a 97-mile-an-hour fastball past Frank Thomas.

Rivera finished a 1-2-3 ninth by getting Marco Scutaro to dribble a harmless grounder to second base. It was Scutaro, then with Oakland, who felled Rivera with a game-ending homer last April. The Yankees hope this game-ender is a better omen.

Girardi worked all winter to give the Yankees their best chance. The Yankees have failed to win a playoff series since 2004, and Girardi has prepared meticulously since replacing Torre last Nov. 1.

The players responded before spring training, with Johnny Damon, Bobby Abreu and Jason Giambi among those coming to camp in better shape. All three showed evidence of spring in their steps on Tuesday — Damon slashed a triple, Abreu scored from first on a double and Giambi sprang from his feet to grab a liner by Scutaro with the infield in and a runner on second in the seventh inning.

Toronto starter, Roy Halladay, came into the game with a 10-4 record against the Yankees. He flummoxed Damon and Derek Jeter with darting fastballs and curves in the first inning, but then fell behind Abreu and Rodriguez, who made him pay.

Abreu singled and Rodriguez drove a double to the gap in right-center field. Rodriguez spread his arms wide and clapped as Abreu hustled home for the game’s first run.

“You have to use all your abilities,” Abreu said. “It’s not just about hitting, but your speed. I know I don’t look like I can run that much, but that’s a big part of the game, to try to get the extra base.”

Wang, who was blitzed twice by Cleveland in the playoff loss last fall, was shaky in spring training as he developed his slider and changeup. But he was sharp on Tuesday, using the slider for his two strikeouts and his usual sinker for most of the rest.

Girardi kept him in with two out and a runner on third in the seventh, and Wang need just one pitch to get an inning-ending grounder from David Eckstein.

“You want to look a guy in the eyes and see what he has,” Girardi said. “And I liked what I saw.”

Cabrera helped Wang with two standout catches on successive plays in the fourth inning. Cabrera, who was offered to Minnesota at the winter meetings in the Johan Santana talks, robbed Lyle Overbay at the wall in right-center field with a leaping catch. Then he stretched with his glove for an off-balance, tumbling grab in left center to take a hit from Aaron Hill.

“I’m glad we didn’t trade him,” Jeter said, “because I don’t think we would have won if we didn’t have him tonight.”

Cabrera’s homer came as the leadoff hitter in the sixth, when he took a sophisticated at-bat against Halladay. Cabrera fell behind, 1-2, but worked the count full and hit four fouls before pulling a cutter down the right-field line, just past the 314-foot marker on the wall.

“It was a patented Yankee Stadium home run,” Blue Jays Manager John Gibbons said. But it counted the same as any other. The score was tied, 2-2, and the Yankees nudged ahead on a bases-loaded grounder by Hideki Matsui with one out in the seventh.

Matsui, who missed part of spring training as he recovered from knee surgery, stung a hard grounder off Halladay and Hill deflected the ball at second. He could get only a force at second as Rodriguez crossed the plate.

Chamberlain’s arrival seemed to punctuate the good feeling. Protecting leads is what he did so well late last summer, and here was Chamberlain on the first day of April, at it again.

The Blue Jays managed no hits off Chamberlain or Rivera, who knew just what to say to Girardi when he gave him the ball.

“That’s No. 1,” Rivera told him. “Let’s have a lot more.”


Inside Pitch

Shelley Duncan, who was suspended three games and fined for inciting a brawl against the Tampa Bay Rays on March 12, said he would have his appeal heard Monday. Melky Cabrera, who was also suspended three games and fined, said he was still talking with his agent about the timing of his appeal hearing.